ANPP: Applicability in the procedural phase and retroactivity to facts prior to Law 13.964/2019
Abstract
Criminal law and criminal procedure. Writ of habeas corpus. Agreement not to prosecute (art. 28-A of the CPP). Retroactivity until the receipt of the complaint.
Law 13.964/2019, insofar as it establishes the agreement not to prosecute (ANPP), is considered a criminal law of a hybrid nature, admitting the conformation between beneficial criminal retroactivity and tempus regit actum. (2) The ANPP is exhausted in the pre-procedural stage, especially when the consequence of its rejection, non-approval or non-compliance is to inaugurate the stage of offering and reception of the complaint. (3) The reception of the complaint puts an end to the pre-procedural stage, and the acts carried out in accordance with the law in force at that time must be considered valid. Therefore, beneficial criminal retroactivity applies to allow the application of the ANPP to acts prior to Law No. 13.964/2019, as long as the complaint has not been received. (4) In the specific case, at the time of the entry into force of Law No. 13. 964/2019, there was a criminal conviction and its confirmation on appeal, which makes it impossible to restore the criminal prosecution phase already completed in order to admit the ANPP. (5) Interlocutory appeal dismissed, establishing the following thesis: "the agreement not to prosecute (ANPP) applies to events that occurred before Law No. 13.964/2019, as long as the indictment has not been received."
(HC 191464 AgR, Rapporteur: ROBERTO BARROSO, First Chamber, judged on 11/11/2020, DJe-280 DIVULG 25-11-2020 PUBLIC 26-11-2020) (emphasis added - IBCCRIM Register 6280).
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Me. Anderson Bezerra Lopes, Me. Gessika Christiny Drakoulakis

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.
Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).




