ANPP: Applicability in the procedural phase and retroactivity to facts prior to Law 13.964/2019

Authors

  • Anderson Bezerra Lopes Universidade de São Paulo - USP - São Paulo/SP
  • Gessika Christiny Drakoulakis Universidade de São Paulo - USP - São Paulo/SP

Abstract

Criminal law and criminal procedure. Writ of habeas corpus. Agreement not to prosecute (art. 28-A of the CPP). Retroactivity until the receipt of the complaint.

Law 13.964/2019, insofar as it establishes the agreement not to prosecute (ANPP), is considered a criminal law of a hybrid nature, admitting the conformation between beneficial criminal retroactivity and tempus regit actum. (2) The ANPP is exhausted in the pre-procedural stage, especially when the consequence of its rejection, non-approval or non-compliance is to inaugurate the stage of offering and reception of the complaint. (3) The reception of the complaint puts an end to the pre-procedural stage, and the acts carried out in accordance with the law in force at that time must be considered valid. Therefore, beneficial criminal retroactivity applies to allow the application of the ANPP to acts prior to Law No. 13.964/2019, as long as the complaint has not been received. (4) In the specific case, at the time of the entry into force of Law No. 13. 964/2019, there was a criminal conviction and its confirmation on appeal, which makes it impossible to restore the criminal prosecution phase already completed in order to admit the ANPP. (5) Interlocutory appeal dismissed, establishing the following thesis: "the agreement not to prosecute (ANPP) applies to events that occurred before Law No. 13.964/2019, as long as the indictment has not been received."

(HC 191464 AgR, Rapporteur: ROBERTO BARROSO, First Chamber, judged on 11/11/2020, DJe-280 DIVULG 25-11-2020 PUBLIC 26-11-2020) (emphasis added - IBCCRIM Register 6280).

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Anderson Bezerra Lopes , Universidade de São Paulo - USP - São Paulo/SP

Advogado. Mestre em Processo Penal pela Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo (2013). Especialista em Direito Penal Econômico e Europeu pela Universidade de Coimbra em parceria com o Instituto Brasileiro de Ciências Criminais (2008). Graduado em Direito pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (2007). Membro do Conselho Editorial do Boletim do Instituto Brasileiro de Ciências Criminais (IBCCRIM). Membro da Associação dos Advogados de São Paulo (AASP). Membro do Instituto dos Advogados Brasileiros (IAB). Lattes CV: http://lattes.cnpq.br/3590593407814503

Gessika Christiny Drakoulakis, Universidade de São Paulo - USP - São Paulo/SP

Doutoranda em Direito Processual na Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo e Mestre em Direito Econômico Internacional na National Research University Higher School of Economics, em Moscou-Rússia (HSE, Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»). Graduada em Direito pela Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Advogada criminal e editora-assistente do Boletim do Instituto Brasileiro de Ciências Criminais (IBCCRIM). Lattes CV: http://lattes.cnpq.br/5926843968417589

Published

2023-09-21

How to Cite

LOPES , Anderson Bezerra; DRAKOULAKIS, Gessika Christiny. ANPP: Applicability in the procedural phase and retroactivity to facts prior to Law 13.964/2019. Boletim IBCCRIM, São Paulo, v. 29, n. 344, p. 32–34, 2023. Disponível em: https://publicacoes.ibccrim.org.br/index.php/boletim_1993/article/view/735. Acesso em: 25 may. 2026.

Metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>