Brief taxonomy of unconstitutional arguments
Keywords:
Execution of a prison sentence without res judicata, UnconstitutionalityAbstract
This essay addresses the four leading arguments used in the defeated votes delivered in the Supreme Court in 2019 that mistakenly tried to deny effectiveness to the constitutional rule defined in article 5, LVII, and later expressed in article 283 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Prof. Dr. Mauricio Stegemann Dieter
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.
Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).
