The sharing of criminal evidence in the draft “Anticrime” Bill
Keywords:
Fundamental right, Law 12.850/2013, Criminal proceedings, Adversarial processAbstract
This study investigates the phenomenon of sharing criminal evidence, both between similar cases and between different types of proceedings (civil or administrative), highlighting its impact on fundamental rights. Law 12.850/2013, which deals with organized crime, allows for extraordinary means of obtaining evidence and joint teams, but poses challenges in terms of judicial control, confidentiality, adversarial proceedings, and limitation of evidence produced in a single proceeding. The circulation of evidence may expand constitutional violations, requiring precise legal discipline to safeguard legality, the right to defense, and the reservation of jurisdiction.
Downloads
References
ABBOUD, Georges. Processo constitucional brasileiro. 2. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2018.p. 735/736.
FERRUA, Paolo. La prova nel processo penale – v. I – Struttura e procedimento. Torino: G. Giappichelli Editore, 2017.
GOMES FILHO, Antônio Magalhães. Limites ao compartilhamento de provas no processo penal. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Criminais, v. 122, p. 43-61, ago. 2016.
LOPES JUNIOR, Aury. Direito processual penal. São Paulo: Saraiva, 9. ed. 2012.
MENDES, Gilmar; BRANCO, Paulo Gonet. Curso de direito constitucional. São Paulo: Saraiva, 12. ed., 2017. SILVA, Jardel Luís da; FELIX, Yuri. Dos limites à atividade probatória no processo penal: ilicitude e compartilhamento de provas. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Criminais: RBCCrim, v. 22, n. 111, p. 209-226, nov./dez. 2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.
Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).
