Crossover youth:

an analysis of the interaction between the child protection and youth justice systems in the portguese socio-legal context

Views: 35

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14420054

Keywords:

Jovens em Crossover, Proteção Infantil, Justiça Juvenil, Interação entre Sistemas

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a considerable increase in interest in understanding the vulnerabilities and different developmental pathways of young people involved simultaneously in both systems. Professionals and researchers have long recognised that crossover youth face significant risks related to mental health issues, substance abuse, academic and interpersonal difficulties, but also early involvement in juvenile justice, the commission of more violent crimes, a higher rate of recidivism, and facing longer detentions and sentences, thus contributing to the propensity to commit crimes. These young people are often exposed to multiple overlapping and interacting risk factors, further exacerbating their vulnerabilities and creating a difficult cycle to break. In addition to this, there is also a call for urgent preventive interventions, implemented collaboratively, aimed at mitigating the social vulnerability of these young people, emphasising the importance of effective integration between the juvenile justice system and child protection services. It is imperative that these interventions are developed by multidisciplinary teams that can holistically address the diverse needs of these young people. Furthermore, it is important that the adopted strategies are continuous and adaptable, to ensure that they provide long-term support and help to develop resilience in the young people. Based on a theoretical literature review, this article aims primarily to understand the characteristics and dynamics of crossover youth, while also proposing to be a theoretical basis for future research on the topic. This study intends to provide a comprehensive and detailed overview of the challenges and needs of crossover youth, promoting the discussion on practices and policies that can improve their life outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
49%
33%
Days to publication 
276
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Publisher 
Editora Revista dos Tribunais (RT)

Author Biographies

Sérgio Dias, Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto, FDUP, Portugal

Doutorando em Criminologia na Escola de Criminologia da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto (FDUP) e Investigador Júnior do Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Justiça (CIJ/FDUP) da mesma faculdade.  Mestre em Estudos da Criança e Licenciado em Criminologia e Justiça Criminal pela Universidade do Minho. 

Ana Margarida Amorim dos Santos, Universidade Lusíada Norte, ULN, Portugal

Doutora em Criminologia e Professora Auxiliar Convidada no 1º e 2ª ciclo de estudos em Criminologia na Escola de Criminologia da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto (FDUP) e Professora Auxiliar na Universidade Lusíada Norte – Porto (UL). É membro do CIJ Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Justiça (CIJ/FDUP) e do CEJEIA (UL). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7319-9303. E-mail: asantos@direito.up.pt

Ana Guerreiro, Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto, FDUP, Portugal

Doutora em Criminologia e Professora Auxiliar da Universidade da Maia (UMaia) e Professora Auxiliar Convidada da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto (FDUP). Investigadora no Centro Interdisciplinar em Estudos de Género (CIEG, ISCSP- UL) e Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Justiça (CIJ, FDUP). 

References

Altschuler, D., Stangler, G., Berkley, K., & Burton, L. (2009). Supporting youth in transition to adulthood: Lessons learned from child welfare and juvenile justice. Washington, DC: Center for Juvenile Justice Reform and Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative. http://cjjr.georgetown.edu/pdfs/TransitionPaperFinal.pdf

American Bar Association (2008). ABA policy and report on crossover and dual jurisdiction youth. Retrieved April 4, 2014. http://www.njjn.org/uploads/digital-library/resource_671.pdf.

Bala, N., Finlay, J., De Filippis, R., & Hunter, K. (2015a). Child welfare adolescents & the youth justice system: Failing to respond effectively to crossover youth. Canadian Criminal Law Review, 19(1), 129-151. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/child-welfare-adolescents-youth-justice-system/docview/1706582541/se-2

Bala, N., Filippis, R., & Hunter, K. (2015b). Crossover Youth: Improving Ontario´s Responses. https://afccontario.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Bala-De-Filippis-Hunter-Crossover-Kids.pdf

Bogie, A., Johnson, K., Ereth, J., & Scharenbroch, C. (2011). Assessing risk of future delinquency among children receiving child protection services. http://www.nccdglobal.org/sites/default/files/publication_pdf/la_delinquency_screening_assessment_report.pdf

Campbell C., Breanna Lowrance Clark, Jordan Papp, Eurielle Kiki, William Miller, Luis Guiterrez, Francis Boateng & Cindy Crusto (2023) Crossover youth and juvenile justice: an examination of criminogenic risk and needs for offenders with child welfare history using the Ohio Youth Assessment System, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 62:8, 483-500. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2023.2261914

Carvalho, M. J. L. (2018). A Privação de Liberdade no Contexto da Justiça Juvenil em Portugal: Tensões, Riscos e Desafios. In M. Alcántara, M. García Montero , & F. Sánchez López (Eds.), Memoria del 56.º Congreso Internacional de Americanistas: Estudios sociales (Vol. 12, pp. 748-759). Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca. Portugal: Tensões, Riscos e Desafios. In M. Alcántara, M. García Montero , & F. Sánchez. https://research.unl.pt/ws/portalfiles/portal/16150497/2018_A_priva_o_de_liberdade_no_contexto_da_justi_a_juvenil_em_Portugal.pdf

Castro, J. (2010). “The punitive turn” - are there any points of resistance? An answer from the portuguese experience. In Cartuyvels, Y. & Bailleau, F (Eds.). The Criminalization of Youth. Juvenile Justice in Europe, Turkey and Canada.VUBPress

Chiodo, D., Leschied, P. C., Whitehead, P. C., & Hurley, D. (2008, May). Child welfare practice and policy related to the impact of children experiencing physical victimization and domestic violence. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(5), 564–574. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.11.008

Cho, M., Haight, W., Choi, W. S., Hong, S., & Piescher, K. (2019). A prospective, longitudinal study of risk factors for early onset of delinquency among maltreated youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 102, 222-230.

Chuang, E. & Wells, R. (2010). The role of inter-agency collaboration in facilitating receipt of behavioral health services for youth involved with child welfare and juvenile justice. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 1814-1822. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.08.002

Conger, D. & Ross, T. (2006). Project Confirm: An outcome evaluation of a program for children in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4, 97-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204005282314

Cutuli, J. J., Goerge, R. M., Coulton, C., Schretzman, M., Crampton, D., Charvat, B. J., & Lee, E. L. (2016). From foster care to juvenile justice: Exploring characteristics of youth in three cities. Children and youth services review, 67, 84-94.

Dannerbeck, A., & Yan, J. (2011). Missouri’s crossover youth: Examining the relationship between their maltreatment history and risk of violence. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles/236317.pdf

Diogo, E., Sacur, B., & Guerra, P. (2022). Caminhos para uma reforma do sistema de promoção e proteção das crianças e jovens - recomendações. Temas Sociais, 3(3), 31-51. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/39991

Fazel, S., Doll, H., & Långström, N. (2008). Mental disorders among adolescents in juvenile deten- tion and correctional facilities: A systematic review and metaregression analysis of 25 surveys. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 47, 1010–1019. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1097/CHI.0b013e31817eecf3

Flores, J. (2013). "Staff Here Let You Get Down”: The cultivation and co-optation of violence in a California juvenile detention center. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 39(1), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1086/670771

Flores, J., Hawes, J., Westbrooks, A., & Henderson, C. (2018). Crossover youth and gender: What are the challenges of girls involved in both the foster care and juvenile justice systems? Children and Youth Services Review, 91, 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.05.031

Garbarino, J. (1999). Lost boys: Why our sons turn violent and how we can save them. New York, NY: The Free Press. 10.1093/pch/10.8.447

Griffin, A. (2014). Dually Involved Youth: Exploring Child Welfare Involvement, Maltreatment, and Offensive Severity.

Goodkind, S., Shook, J.J., Kim, K.H., Pohlig, R.T., & Herring, D.J. (2013). From child welfare to juvenile justice: Race, gender, and system experiences. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 11(3), 249-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204012463409

Guerra, Paulo, “Reflexões Sobre o Sistema Legal de Promoção e Proteção de Crianças e Jovens” in Atores e Dinâmicas no Sistema de Promoção e Proteção de Crianças e Jovens, Rita Francisco e Helena Rebelo (coord.), Universidade Católica Editora, 2021.

Haight, Wendy & Bidwell, Laurel & Choi, Won Seok & Cho, Minhae. (2016). An evaluation of the Crossover Youth Practice Model (CYPM): Recidivism outcomes for maltreated youth involved in the juvenile justice system. Children and Youth Services Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.03.025

Halemba, G. & Seigel, G. (2011). The King County uniting for youth cross system prevalence. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice. https://www.modelsforchange.net/publications/304/Doorways_to_Delinquency_MultiSystem_Involvement_of_Delinquent_Youth_in_King_County_Seattle_WA.pdf

Herz, D. C., & Ryan, J. P. (2008). Building multisystem approaches in child welfare and juvenile justice: Casey family programs.

Herz, D.C., Ryan, J.P., & Bilchik, S.K. (2010). Challenges facing crossover youth: An examination of juvenile-justice decision making and recidivism. Family Court Review, 48(2), 305-321. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01312.x

Herz, D. C., Lee, P., Lutz, L., Steward, M., tuell, J., & Wiig, J. (2012). Addressing the needs of multi-system youth: Strengthening the connection between child welfare and juvenile justice. https://www.njjn.org/uploads/digital-library/Addressing-the-Needs-of-MultiSystem-Youth-Strengthening-the-Connection-between-Child-Welfare-and-Juvenile-Justice-CJJR-3.1.12.pdf

Herz, D. C., Eastman, A. L., Putnam-Hornstein, E., & McCroskey, J. (2021). Dual system youth and their pathways in Los Angeles County: a replication of the OJJDP system youth study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 118, 105160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu. 2021.105160

Irvine, A., & Canfield, A. (2016). The overrepresentation of lesbian, gay, bisexual, questioning, gender nonconforming and transgen- der youth within the child welfare to juvenile justice crossover population. Journal on Gender, Social Policy, and the Law, 24(2), 243–261

Jonson-Reid, M. & Barth R. (2000). From placement to prison: The path to adolescent incarceration from child welfare supervised foster or group care. Children and Youth Services Review, 22, 493- 516. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-7409(00)00100-6

Jonson-Reid, M. (2002). Exploring the relationship between child welfare intervention and juvenile corrections involvement. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 72, 559-576. https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.72.4.559

Jonson-Reid, M., Kohl, P.L., & Drake, B. 2012. Child and adult outcomes of chronic child maltreatment. Pediatrics 129,839-845. 10.1542/peds.2011-2529

Kerig, P. K. (2018). Polyvictimization and Girls’ Involvement in the Juvenile Justice System: Investigating Gender-Differentiated Patterns of Risk, Recidivism, and Resilience. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(5), 789-809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517744843

Kilpatrick, D. G., Ruggiero, K. J., Acierno, R., Saunders, B. E., Resnick, H. S., & Best, C. L. (2003). Violence and risk of PTSD, major depression, substance abuse/dependence, and comorbidity: Results from the national survey of adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(4), 692–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.71.4.692

Kim, K. (2012). The role of culture in theories of the intergenerational transmission of violence. Child and Family Social Work, 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00793.x

Lutz, L., Stewart, M., Legters, L. & Herz, D. (2009). Crossover youth practice model. Washington, DC: Center for Juvenile Justice Reform and Casey Family Programs.

Malvaso, C. G., Delfabbro, P. H., & Day, A. (2016). Risk factors that influence the maltreatment-offending association: A systematic review of prospective and longitudinal studies. Aggression and violent behavior, 31, 1-15.

Modrowski, C. A., Chaplo, S. D., & Kerig, P. K. (2022). Advancing our understanding of the risk factors associated with crossover youth in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems: A trauma-informed research agenda. Clinical child and family psychology review, 25(2), 283-299.Ødegård, A. (2005). Perceptions of interprofessional collaboration in relation to children with mental health problems. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(4), 347–357. 10.1080/13561820500148437

Pinto J, Fernandes A, Mesquita C, Maia Â. (2015) Childhood Adversity Among Institutionalized Male Juvenile Offenders and Other High-Risk Groups Without Offense Records in Portugal. Violence Vict. 2015;30(4):600-14. 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00002

Reeves, S., Lewin, S., Espin, S., & Zwarenstein, M. (2010). Interprofessional teamwork for health and social care: Promoting partnership for health. Chichester, UK: Wiley- Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444325027.FMATTER

Rollins, B. C., & Thomas, D. L. (1979). Parental support, power, and control techniques in the socialization of children. In W. R. Bur, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. 1, pp. 317–364).

Ross, T., Conger, D., & Armstrong, M. (2002). Bridging child welfare and juvenile justice: Preventing unnecessary detention of foster children. Child Welfare, 81, 471-494.

Ryan, J.P. & Testa, M.F. (2005). Child maltreatment and juvenile delinquency: Investigating the role of placement and placement stability. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 227-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.05.007

Ryan, J.P., Herz, D. Hernandez, P.M., & Marshall, J.M. (2007). Maltreatment and delinquency: investigating child welfare bias in juvenile justice. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 1035-1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.04.002

Ryan, J.P., Marshall, J.M., Herz, D., & Hernandez, P.M. (2008). Juvenile delinquency in child welfare: Investigating group home effects. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 1088-1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.02.004

Saia, Koidu & Toros, Karmen & DiNitto, Diana. (2020). Interprofessional collaboration in social rehabilitation services for dually-involved Estonian youth: Perceptions of youth, parents, and professionals. Children and Youth Services Review. 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104945

Siegel, G. & Lord, R. (2004). When systems collide: Improving court practices and programs in dual jurisdiction cases. Retrieved March 17, 2014, from http://www.ncjj.org/PDF/dualjurisdiction.pdf.

Simmons-Horton, Sherri. (2021). “A Bad Combination”: Lived Experiences of Youth Involved in the Foster Care and Juvenile Justice Systems. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal. 38. 10.1007/s10560-020-00693-1

Stewart, A., Livingston, M. & Waterson, E. (2008). Transitions and turning points: Examining the links between child maltreatment and juvenile offending. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 51-66. 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.04.011

Verrecchia, P.J., Fetzer, M.D., Lemmon, J.H., & Austin, T.L. (2010). An examination of direct and indirect effects of maltreatment dimensions and other ecological risks on persistent youth offending. Criminal Justice Review, 35, 220-243. 10.1177/0734016809360327

White, L. O., Klein, A. M., Kirschbaum, C., Kurz-Adam, M., Uhr, M., Müller-Myhsok, B., et al. (2015). Analyzing pathways from childhood maltreatment to internalizing symptoms and disorders in children and adolescents (AMIS): a study protocol. BMC Psychiatry, 1-18. 10.1186/s12888-015-0512-z

Wiig, J. (2003). Understanding child maltreatment and juvenile delinquency: Foundations for effective response. In Wiig, J., Widom, C.S., & Tuell, J.A., Understanding Child Maltreatment and Juvenile Delinquency: From Research to Effective Program, Practice, and Systemic Solutions. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America, Inc. https://rfknrcjj.org/images/PDFs/Understanding_Child_Maltreatment_and_Juvenile_Delinquency_From_Research_to_Effective_Program_Practice_and_Systemic_Solutions.pdf

Wiig, J. & Tuell, J.A. (2013). Guidebook for juvenile justice and child welfare system coordination and integration. Boston: Robert F. Kennedy Children’s Action Corps. https://www.njjn.org/uploads/digital-library/MfC_Guidebook-for-JJ-CW-Crossover-Youth_March-2014.pdf

Yampolskaya, S., Armstrong, M. I., & McNeish, R. (2011). Children placed in out-of-home care: Risk factors for involvement with the juvenile justice system. Violence and victims, 26(2), 231-245.

Yessine, A. (2011). Risk factors for delinquency among Canadian youth: Current knowledge and future directions. Public Safety Canada. https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/lbrr/archives/cn24502-eng.pdf

Young, D., Bowley, A., Bilanin, J., & Ho, A. (2015). Traversing two systems: An assessment of crossover youth in Maryland. Retrieved from the National Criminal Justice Reference Service website: https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/248679.pdf

Published

2025-04-14

How to Cite

Dias, S., Santos, A. M. A. dos, & Guerreiro, A. (2025). Crossover youth: : an analysis of the interaction between the child protection and youth justice systems in the portguese socio-legal context. Brazilian Journal of Criminal Science, 207(207), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14420054