The comparative study of American plea bargaining:
a methodological analysis
Views: 55Keywords:
Comparative law, Consensual criminal justice, Plea bargaining, Macro-comparison, Micro-comparisonAbstract
The paper aims to discuss methodological issues related to the comparative study of the american plea bargaining. To achieve this goal, two useful comparative approaches will be presented: Damaška's macro-comparative approach, which focuses on the relationship between criminal procedure and the way political power is exercised and Van Hoecke's deep level micro-comparative approach, wich includes the deeper level of underlying theories and conceptions in the comparative law research. The paper will show that the use of the appropriate method is fundamental to avoid misunderstandings and to ensure that comparative research of plea baragaining contributes to discussions on the consensual criminal justice system in Brazil.
Downloads
References
ALBERGARIA, P. S. Plea bargaining: aproximação à justiça negociada nos E.U.A. Coimbra: Almedina, 2007.
BETTWY, S. W. A Survey of Comparative Criminal Procedure through Foreign Films. Opinio Juris in Comparatione: Studies in Comparative and National Law, Pisa, v. I, n. Special Issue, 2014. Disponivel em: <[https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2543771>. ]. Acesso em: 21 jul .07.2018.
BORGES, J. L. funesFunes, o memorioso. In: BORGES, J. L. Ficções. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2007. p. 99-108.
BOVINO, A. Procedimiento Abreviado y Juicio por jurados. In: MAIER, J. B.; BOVINO, A. El procedimiento abreviado. Buenos Aires: Del Puerto, 2001.
BROOK, C. et al. A Comparative Look at Plea Bargaining in Australia, Canada, England, New Zealand, and the United States. William & Mary Law Review, v. 57, mai 2016. Disponivel em: <[https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2774262>. ]. Acesso em: 5 mai 05.05.2018.
CAHILL, M. T.; ROBINSON, P. H. Can a Model Penal Code Second Save the States from Themselves? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, p. 169-177, 2003. Disponivel em: <[https://ssrn.com/abstract=634361>. ]. Acesso em: 17 ago .08.2018.
CERQUEIRA, G. Comparação jurídica e ideias de modernização do direito no início do Século XXI. Revista de Direito Internacional, v. 17, n. 1, 2020. Disponivel em: . ]. Acesso em: 5 nov 05.11.2020.
CUNHA, V. S. Acordos de admissão de culpa no processo penal: devido processo, efetividade e garantias. Salvador: Editora Juspodivm, 2019.
DAMASKA, M. Evidentiary Barriers to Conviction and Two Models of Criminal Procedure: A Comparative Study. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, p. 506, 1973. Disponivel em: <[https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/penn_law_review/vol121/iss3/10/>. /]. Acesso em: 27 jul .07.2018.
DAMASKA, M. The faces of justice and state authority. New Haven: Yale Universsity Press, 1986.
DAMASKA, M. Negotiated Justice in International Criminal Courts. Journal of International Criminal Justice, v. 2, p. 1018-1039, 2004. Disponivel em: <[https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/2.4.1018>. ]. Acesso em: 17 mar .03.2018.
DAMASKA, M. R. Structures of Authority and Comparative Criminal Procedure. Yale Law Journal, v. 84, n. 3, p. 480-544, 1975. Disponivel em: <[http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylj/vol84/iss3/4/>. /]. Acesso em: 28 jul .07.2018.
DUTRA, D. C. Método(s) em Direito Comparado. Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR, v. 61, n. 3, p. 189-212, 2016.
DUTRA, D. C. ____________. Transplantes Jurídicos: história, teoria e crítica no Direito Comparado. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFRGS, Porto Alegre, v. 39, p. 76-96, dez. 2018. Disponivel em: <[https://seer.ufrgs.br/revfacdir/article/view/83607>. ]. Acesso em: 06 nov .11.2020.
FEELEY, M. M. Plea bargaining and the structure of the criminal process. The Justice System Journal, p. 338-354, 1982.
FISHER, G. Plea bargaining’s triumph: a history of plea bargaining in America. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.
GAROUPA, N.; STEPHEN, F. H. Why Plea-Bargaining Fails to Achieve Results in So Many Criminal Justice Systems: A New Framework for Assessment. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, v. 15, n. 3, p. 323-358, set 2008. Disponivel em: <[http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1023263X0801500303>. ]. Acesso em: 3 mai 03.05.2018.
GARRETT, B. L. Why Plea Bargains are Not Confessions. William & Mary Law Review, v. 56, 2016. Disponivel em: <[https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2533985>. ]. Acesso em: 6 mai06.05. 2016.
GRIFFIN, L. K. State Incentives, Plea Bargaining Regulation, and the Failed Market for Indigent Defense. Law and Contemporary Problems, v. 80, 2017. Disponivel em: <[https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2926638>. ]. Acesso em: 6 mai 06.05.2018.
GUIDORIZZI, D. D. Should we Really Ban Plea Bargaining: The Core Concerns of Plea Bargaining Critics. Emory Law Journal, v. 47, p. 753-784, 1998. Disponivel em: <[http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/emlj47&div=22&id=&page=>. =]. Acesso em: 29 mar .03.2018.
HOECKE, M. V. Deep Level Comparative Law. In: HOECKE, M. V. Epistemology and Methodology of Comparative Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004.
JACKSON, V. C. Methodological Challenges in Comparative Constitutional Law. Penn State International Law Review, v. 28, n. 3, p. 319-326, 2010. Disponivel em: <[https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1739756>. ]. Acesso em: 5 nov05.11. 2020.
JIMÉNEZ, C. A. Q. La Justicia Penal Negociada en Estados Unidos y Colombia. Estudio comparado desde una perspectiva de Cultura Jurídica. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - – Facultad de Derecho, Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá. 2013.
LANGBEIN, J. H. Torture and Plea Bargaining. University of Chicago Law Review, v. 46, n. 1, 1978. Disponivel em: <[https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclrev/vol46/iss1/3>. ]. Acesso em: 14 ago .08.2018.
LANGER, M. La dicotomia acusatorio-inquisitivo y la importación de macanismos procesaler de la tradición jurídica anglosajana. Alguns reflexiones a partir del procedimineto abreviado. In: MAIER, J.; BOVINO, A. El procedimiento abreviado. Buenos Aieres: Del Puerto, 2001. p. 97-133.
LANGER, M. ____________. From Legal Transplants to Legal Translations: The Globalization of Plea Bargaining and the Americanization Thesis in Criminal Procedure. Harvard International Law Journal, v. 45, n. 1, 2005. Disponivel em: <[https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=707261>. ]. Acesso em: 5 mai05.05. 2004.
LANGER, M.; ROACH, K. Direitos no processo penal: um estudo de caso sobre convergência e direitos de disclosure. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Criminais, v. 23, n. 116, p. 239-257, 2015. Disponivel em: < http://[www.mpsp.mp.br/portal/page/portal/documentacao_e_divulgacao/doc_biblioteca/bibli_servicos_produtos/bibli_boletim/bibli_bol_2006/RBCCrim_n.116.09.PDF>. ]. Acesso em: 5 mai05.05. 2004.
LASCU, L. A. Is the plea agreement practice of the International Criminal tribunals a pathway to negotiated justice within national jurisdictions? Law Review, v. 3, n. 2, p. 63-89, 2013. Disponivel em: . ]. Acesso em: 17 ago .08.2018.
LEITE, R. V. Justiça consensual e efetividade do processo penal. Belo Horizonte: Del Rey, 2013.
LUNDMARK, T. Charting the divide between common and civil law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
MA, Y. Prosecutorial Discretion and Plea Bargaining in the United States, France, Germany, and Italy: A Comparative Perspective. In: FROHMANN, L. Prosecutors and Prosecution. Hampshire: Ashgate, 2008.
MILLER, R. B. The Epistemology of Plea Bargaining. Social Epistemology, p. 1-12, 2020.
MOREIRA, J. C. B. O Processo Penal norte-americano e sua influência. In: MOREIRA, J. C. B. Temas de direito processual - – Oitava série. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2004. p. 223-227.
ORTMAN, W. When Plea Bargaining Became Normal. Boston University Law Review, 2020. v. 100, n. 4, p. 1435–1499. Disponível em: . ]. Acesso em: 24 abr. .04.2021.
PETRIG, A. Negotiated Justice and the Goals of International. Chicago-Kent Journal of International and Comparative Law, v. 8, n. 1, 2008. Disponivel em: <[https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/ckjicl/vol8/iss1/1/>. /]. Acesso em: 5 mai05.05. 2018.
PIZZI, W. T. Understanding Prosecutorial Discretion in the United States: The Limits of Comparative Criminal Procedure as an Instrument of Reform. Ohio State Law Journal, v. 54, n. 5, 1993. Disponivel em: <[https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/1811/64665/1/OSLJ_V54N5_1325.pdf>. ]. Acesso em: 5 mai05.05. 2018.
ROBERTS, P. Faces of Justice Adrift? Damaška's Comparative Method and the Future of Common Law Evidence. In: JACKSON, J. D.; LANGER, M.; TILLERS, P. Crime, Procedure and Evidence in a Comparative and International Context: Essays in honour of Professor Mirjan Damaska. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008.
ROBINSON, P. H.; CAHILL, M. T. Can a Model Penal Code Second Save the States from Themselves Commentary Symposium: Model Penal Code Second: Good or Bad Idea. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 2004. 2003. v. 1, n. 1, p. 169–-178. Disponível em: <[https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/42/>./].
RUSSEL, B. História da filosofia ocidental - – Livro 1: A filosofia antiga. Tradução de. Hugo Langone. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 2015.
TARUFFO, M. Modelli di prova e di procedimento probatorio. Rivista di Diritto Processuale, Padova, v. 45, n. 2, p. 420-448, 1990.
TURNER, J. I. Judicial Participation in Plea Negotiations: A Comparative View. American Journal of Comparative Law, v. 94, 2006. Disponivel em: <[https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=871979>. ]. Acesso em: 3 mai03.05. 2018.
TURNER, J. I. ____________.. Plea Bargaining. In: LUNA, E. Reforming Criminal Justice: Pretrial and Trial Processes. Phoenix: Arizona State University, v. 3, 2017. p. 73-99.
ZILLI, M. A. C. A iniciativa instrutória do juiz no processo penal. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2003.
ZWEIGERT, K.; KÖTZ, H. An Introduction to Comparative Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Jurisprudência
US. Supreme Court. Caso Hutto v. Ross. 1976. Disponível em: <[https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/429/28/#tab-opinion-1951958> ]. Acesso em: 20 out .10.2020.
US. Supreme Court. ____________. Caso Kercheval v. United States. 1927. Disponível em: <[https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/274/220/> /]. Acesso em: 20 out .10.2020.
US. Supreme Court. ____________. Caso Santobello v. New York. 1971. Disponível em: <[https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/404/257/> /]. Acesso em: 20 out .10.2020.
US. Supreme Court. ____________. Caso United States v. Batchelder. 1979. Disponível em: <[https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/442/114/#tab-opinion-1953178> ]. Acesso em: 20 out .10.2020.
ZILLI, M. A. C. A iniciativa instrutória do juiz no processo penal. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2003.
ZWEIGERT, K.; KÖTZ, H. An Introduction to Comparative Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Os direitos autorais dos artigos publicados são do autor, com direitos do periódico sobre a primeira publicação.
Os autores somente poderão utilizar os mesmos resultados em outras publicações indicando claramente este periódico como o meio da publicação original. Se não houver tal indicação, considerar-se-á situação de autoplágio.
Portanto, a reprodução, total ou parcial, dos artigos aqui publicados fica sujeita à expressa menção da procedência de sua publicação neste periódico, citando-se o volume e o número dessa publicação. Para efeitos legais, deve ser consignada a fonte de publicação original.
Português (Brasil)
English
Español (España)
