Entrevista forense com crianças no Brasil:
as percepções dos juízes após cinco anos de reforma legislativa
Vistas: 11DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12628288Palabras clave:
Forensic interviewing, Training, Brazil’s Law Reform, Children, JudgesResumen
O Brasil passou por uma reforma legislativa há cinco anos, quando a Lei n. 13.431 entrou em vigor. A lei exige que um profissional devidamente capacitado conduza a entrevista da criança (em um ambiente seguro) que seja possível vítima ou testemunha de violência. Este artigo objetiva i) identificar o ponto de vista dos juízes sobre os novos requisitos da lei e sua implementação, e ii) fazer recomendações para melhorar a qualidade da entrevista forense com crianças no futuro. Para isso, este trabalho buscou a perspectiva dos juízes, que tomam a decisão final, e que raramente são o público-alvo da pesquisa. Dezesseis entrevistas semiestruturadas foram conduzidas com juízes estaduais brasileiros. Sobretudo, três principais preocupações dos juízes foram identificadas: (1) insuficiência de entrevistadores forenses treinados; (2) infraestrutura limitada dos Tribunais para implementação do procedimento previsto na lei; e (3) mínimo interesse dos profissionais do Direito em relação às práticas relacionadas à entrevista forense. Os resultados apontam para a direção onde os investimentos públicos devem ser feitos.
Descargas
Citas
AKEHURST, L., MILNE, R. & KOHNKEN, G. (2003). The effects of children's age and delay on recall in a cognitive structured interview. Psychology, Crime & Law. 9, pp. 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1080=1068316021000057686
ANDREWS, S. J., AHERN, E. C., STOLZENBERG, S. N., & LYON, T. D. (2016). The productivity of wh- prompts when children testify. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, pp. 341-349. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3204
ANDREWS, S. K. & LAMB, M. E. The structural linguistic complexity of lawyers’ questions and children’s responses in Scottish criminal courts. (2017). Child abuse & Neglect, 65, 185-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.01.022
ATC (2011) Raising the Bar. London: ATC.
AVILA, G. N. (2013). Falsas memórias e sistema penal: a prova testemunhal em xeque [False memories and the criminal system: testimonial evidence in check]. Lumen juris.
BARROS, F. DE M. (2008). A participação da vítima no processo penal [Victims participation on criminal lawsuits]. Lumen juris.
BAKER, M., FESSINGER, M., MCWILLIAMS, K., & WILLIAMS, S. (2021). The use of note-taking during forensic interviews: Perceptions and practical recommendations for interviewers. Developmental Child Welfare, 3(1), pp. 20-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/25161032211002187
BABB, B. A. (2021). Family law and therapeutic jurisprudence: A caring combination. Family Court Review, 59(3), pp. 409-413. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12585
BAUGERUD, G., JOHNSON, M. S., HANSEN, H. B. G., MAGNUSSEN, S., & LAMB, M. E. (2020). Forensic interviews with preschool children: An analysis of extended interviews in Norway (2015-2017). Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34, pp. 654-663.
BITTAR, W. B. (2017). O problema do conteúdo da valoração do depoimento dos delatores diante do conceito de justa causa para o regular exercício da ação penal [The problem of the content of the recognition of the testimony of the informers towards the concept of just cause for the regular exercise of the criminal action]. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, 3(1), 2525-510X. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v3i1.41
BORGES, C., MAYER, S., & MARTINS, C. (22 Jun 2022). Quem ‘e Joana Ribeiro, ju’iza que impediu o aborto de uma menina de 11 anos que foi estuprada. [Who is Joana Ribeiro, the Judge who banned abortion for 11 year old girl who was raped]. G1 Santa Catarina. https://g1.globo.com/sc/santa-catarina/noticia/2022/06/22/quem-e-joana-ribeiro-zimmer-juiza-que-impediu-o-aborto-de-uma-menina-de-11-anos-que-foi-estuprada.ghtml
BRAUN, V., & CLARKE, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
BROWN, D. A., & LAMB, M. E.(2019). Forks in the road, routes chosen, and journeys that beckon: A selective review of scholarship on children’s testimony. Appl Cogn Psychol, 33, pp. 480-480. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3511
BRYMAN, A; CLARK, T; SLOAN, L; FOSTER, L. (2021). Bryman’s Social Research Method. Sith Edition. Oxford Press.
BRAZIL. Brazilian penal code. 1940. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/del2848compilado.htm
BRAZIL. Statute of the child and adolescent. Law 8.069. 1990. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8069.htm
BRAZIL. Law 13.431. 2017. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2017/lei/l13431.htm
BRAZIL. Ministério Público Federal. Recomendação nº 19/2022– GABDCE – PR/SC – MPF. Submitted by Daniele Cardoso Escobar. 22 Jun 2022. https://www.mpf.mp.br/sc/sala-de-imprensa/docs/2022/recomendacao-menor-hu-aborto
BRAZIL. Santa Catarina. Secretaria de Estado da Saúde. https://www.saude.sc.gov.br/index.php/informacoes-gerais-documentos/atencao-basica/nucleos/nucleo-de-atencao-a-saude-da-mulher-crianca-e-adolescente/manuais-e-publicacoes-saude-da-mulher/18514-interrupcao-legal-da-gestacao/file
BRUER, K. C., WILLIAMS, S., EVANS, A. (2022). Lawyer’s experience questioning children in Canadian court. Child Abuse & Neglect 134 (2022) 105930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105930
BULL, R., & MILNE, R. (2020). Recommendations for collecting event memory evidence. In J. POZZULO, E. PICA, & C. SHEAHAN (Eds.). Memory and sexual misconduct: Psychological research for criminal justice. Routledge.
CAMPOS, D. S. (2014). Análise da atuação do conselho tutelar diante das notificações de abuso e exploração sexual [Analysis of the action of the tutelary council facing notifications of sexual abuse and exploitation] [Masters dissertation, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz]. https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/bitstream/handle/icict/10962/daniel_campos_iff_mest_2014.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
CEZAR, J. A. (2010). A escuta de crianças e adolescente em juízo: uma questão legal ou um exercício de direitos? [Hearing of children in Court: a legal matter or a right being exercised?] In L. Potter (Ed.). Depoimento sem dano [Deposition without harm]. Lumen juris.
COOPER, P., DANDO, C., ORMEROD, T., MATTISON, M., MARCHANT, R., MILNE, R. & BULL, R. (2018). One step forward and two steps back? The ‘20 Principles’ for questioning vulnerable witnesses and the lack of an evidence-based approach. The International Journal of evidence & proof. 22(4), pp. 392-410.
CYR, M., DION, J., GENDRON, A., POWELL, M., & BRUBACHER, S. (2021). A test of three refresher modalities on child forensic interviewers’ posttraining performance. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 27(2), pp. 221-230. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000300
DANDO, C. J., ORMEROD, T. C., COOPER, P., MARCHANT, R., MATTISON, M., MILNE, R, & BULL, R. (2018). No evidence against sketch reinstatement of context, verbal labels or use of registered intermediaries for children with autism spectrum disorder: Response to Henry et al. (2017). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48, pp. 2593-2596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3479-z
DANDO, C. J., GABBERT, F., & HOPE, L. (2020). Supporting older eyewitnesses’ episodic memory: the self-administered interview and sketch reinstatement of context. Memory, 28(6), pp. 712-723. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2020.1757718
DURSTON, G. (2011). Evidence: Text & Materials. 2nd edition. Oxford Press.
EARHART, B.; BRUBACHER, S. P.; POWELL, M. B.; WESTERA, N. J.; GOODMAN-DELAHUNTY, J. (2017). Judges’ delivery of ground rules to child witnesses in Australian courts. Child Abuse and Neglect. DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.08.005
G. A. Res. 40/34 (Nov. 29, 1985). https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/declaration-basic-principles-justice-victims-crime-and-abuse
G. A. Res. 45/121 (Apr. 3, 1991). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/105578?ln=en.
GRICE, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Harvard University Press.
GUIMARÃES, P., DE LARA, B, & DIAS, T. (2022, June 20). Suportaria ficar mais um pouquinho? [Would stand to keep it a little longer?]. The Intercept Brasil. https://theintercept.com/2022/06/20/video-juiza-sc-menina-11-anos-estupro-aborto/
HABIGZANG, L. F., RAMOS, M. S., KOLLER, S. H. (2011). A revelacao de abuso sexual: as medidas adotadas pela rede de apoio. [The disclosure of sexual abuse: adopted measures bu the support network]. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa. 27(4), pp. 467-473.
HAGSANDA, A. V., HJELMSÄTERA, E. R., GRANHAGA P. A., FAHLKEA, C., & GORDH, A. S. (2017). Witnesses stumbling down memory lane: The effects of alcohol intoxication, retention interval, and repeated interviewing. Memory, 25(4), pp. 531-543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1191652).
HERSHKOWITZ, I., AHERN, E. C., LAMB, M. E., BLASBLAG, U., KARNI-VISEL, Y., & BREITMAN, M. (2017). Changes in interviewers’ use of supportive techniques during revised protocol training. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31, pp. 340-350. DOI: 10.1002/acp.3333
HILL, J. A., & MOSTON, S. (2011). Police perceptions of investigative interviewing: training needs and operational practices in Australia. The British Journal of Forensic Practice, 13(2), pp. 72-83. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636641111134314
HOWE, M. L. & KNOTT, L. M. (2015). The fallibility of memory in judicial processes: Lessons from the past and their modern consequences. Memory, 23(5), pp. 633-656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2015.1010709)
LAMB, M. E., & BROWN, D. A. (2006). Conversational apprentices: Helping children become competent informants about their own experiences. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 215–234. DOI:10.1348/026151005X57657
LAMB, M. E., HERSHKOWITZ, I., ORBACH, Y. & ESPLIN, P. W. (2008). Tell me what happened: structured investigative interviews of child victims and witnesses. John Wiley & Sons.
LIMA, R. B. (2013). Curso de Processo Penal. Impetus.
LOFTUS, E. F.; WOLCHOVER, D.; & PAGE, D. (2006). General Review of the Psychology of witness testimony In A. Heaton-Armstrong; E. Shepherd; G. Gudjonsson; & D. Wolchover (Ed). Witness Testimony: Psychological, investigative and evidential perspectives, Oxford Press, p. 7-22.
LOFTUS, E. (2013). The fiction of memory. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbMO1__9K5g
MATTISON, M. L. A., DANDO, C. J., & ORMEROD, T. C. (2015). Sketching to remember: episodic free recall task support for child witnesses and victims with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord, 45, pp. 1751-1765. DOI 10.1007/s10803-014-2335-z
MILNE, B. & BULL, R. (2006). Interviewing victims of crime, including children and people with intellectual disabilities. Kebbell, M. & Davies, G. (Ed.). Practical Psychology for forensic investigations and prosecutions. Wiley.
MILNE, R. & BULL, R. (2010). Does the cognitive interview help children to resist the effects of suggestive questioning? Legal and Criminological Psychology. 8(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532503762871219
MILNE, R., SHARMANB, S. J., POWELL, M. B., & MEAD, S. (2013). Assessing the Effectiveness of the Cognitive Interview for Children with Severe Intellectual Disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 60(1). 18–29, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2013.757137
MITCHELS, B. (2016). Children and vulnerable witnesses in court proceedings. Wildy, Simmonds & Hill Publishing.
NIELD, R.; MILNE, R.; BULL, R.; & MARLOW, K. (2003). The Youth Justice and criminal evidence Act 1999 and the interviewing of vulnerable groups: A practitioner’s perspective. Legal and criminlogical Psychology, 8, 223-228. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532503322362997
O’MAHONY, B. M. (2016). How Effective are Judges and Counsel at Facilitating Communication with Vulnerable Persons in a Criminal Trial? In Cooper, P.; & Hunting, L. (Ed). Addressing vulnerability in Justice systems. Wildy, Simmonds & Hill Publishing.
PASE, H. L., CUNHA, G. P., BORGES, M. L.; & PATELLA, A. P. D. (2020). O Conselho Tutelar e as políticas públicas para crianças e adolescentes. [The Guardianship Council and public policy for children and adolescents]. Cad. EBAPE.BR, 18(4), 1003-1010. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120190153
PAGE, M. & PRECEY, G. (2002). Child protection concerns when questioning children. In H. I. Westcott; G. M. Davies & R. Bull (Ed.), Children's testimony: a handbook of psychological research and forensic practice (pp. 37-50). John Wily & Sons Ltd.
PERRY, N. W., MCAULIFF, B. D., TAM, P., CLAYCOMB, L., DOSTAL, C. & FLANAGAN, C. (2001). When lawyers question children: is justice served? In R. Bull (Ed.), Children and the law: the essential readings. (pp. 304-332). Blackwell Publishers.
POWELL, M. B., & BARNETT, M. (2015). Elements underpinning successful implementation of a national best-practice child investigative interviewing framework. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22(3), pp. 368-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2014.951112
POYSER, S. & MILNE, R. (2015). No grounds for complacency and plenty for continued vigilance: miscarriages of justice as drivers for research on reforming the investigative interviewing process. Police Journal, 88(4), pp. 265-280. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0032258X15598951
POYSER, S.; & MILNE, R. (2021). The time in between a case of ‘wrongful’ and ‘rightful’ conviction in the UK: Miscarriages of justice and the contribution of psychology to reforming the police investigative process. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 23(1), pp. 5-16. https:doi.org/10.1177/14613557211006134
PLOTNIKOFF, J. & WOOLFSON, R. (2002). What do judges know about young witnesses? In H. I. Westcott; G. M. Davies & R. Bull (Ed.), Children's testimony: a handbook of psychological research and forensic practice (pp. 295-308). John Wily & Sons Ltd.
QUAS, J. A. & SUMAROKA, M. (2011). Consequences of legal involvement on child victims of maltreatment. P. 323-350. Lamb, M. E.; La Rooy, D. J.; Malloy, L. C.; & Katz, C. (Ed.). Children’s testimony: a handbook of psychological research and forensic practice. Wiley-Blackwell.
ROBERTS, P. & ZUCKERMAN, A. (2010). Criminal Evidence. Second Edition. Oxford University.
SANDERSON, J. & WEATHERS, M. R. (2019). “Every time someone comes forward it makes it easier for the next survivor to be heard”: Sport as a triggering agent to break the silence of child sexual abuse. Communication Quarterly, 67(3), pp. 333-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2019.1596141
SANTOS, S. & DELL’AGLIO, D. (2010). Quando o silêncio é rompido: o processo de revelação e notificação de abuso sexual infantil [When silence is broken: the process of reveal and report of child sexual abuse]. Psicologia & Sociedade, 22 (2), 328-335. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-71822010000200013
SAYWITZ, K. J. & NATHANSON, R. (1993). Children’s memory and their perceptions of stress in and out of the courtroom. Child abuse & neglect, 17, 613-622.
SAYWITZ, K. J. (1995). Improving children’s testimony: the question, the answer, and the environment. In Zaragoza, M. S., Graham, J. R., Hall, G. C. N., Hirschman, R.; Ben-Porath, Y. S. (Ed), Memory and testimony in the child witness (pp. 113-140). SAGE Publications.
SAYWITZ, K. J., & CAMPARO, L. B. (2013). Evidence-based Child Forensic Interviewing: The Developmental Narrative Elaboration Interview. Oxford University Press.
SAYWITZ, K. J. & CAMPARO, L. B. (2014). Interviewing Children: A primer (371-391). Melton, G. B., Ben-Arieh, A., Cashmore, J., Goodman, G. S., & Worley, N. K. The SAGE Handbook of Child Research. SAGE.
SCHMIDT, S.; KRIMBERG, J. S.; STEIN, L. M. (2020). Conhecimento dos magistrados sobre processos de memória nos relatos testemunhais e no reconhecimento de pessoas. [Magistrates' knowledge of memory processes in witness testimony and people recognition]. Revista dos Tribunais Online, 173, pp. 201-243.
SPENCER, J. R. & LAMB, M. E. (2012). Children and Cross-Examination: Time to change the rules? Hart Publishing.
STEELE, L. C. (2012). The forensic interview: A challenging conversation. Goodyear-Brown, P. (Ed.). Handbook of child sexual abuse: Identification, assessment, and treatment (pp. 99–119). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
STEIN, L. M., PERGHER, G. K. & FEIX, L. F. (2009). Desafios da oitiva de crianças e adolescentes: Técnicas de entrevista investigativa. [Challenges on hearing children and adolescents: investigative interview techniques]. Childhood Brasil.
STEWART, H., KATZ, C. & LA ROOY, D. J. (2011). Training forensic interviewers. In M. E. Lamb, D. J. La Rooy, L. C. Malloy; & C. Katz (Ed.), Children's testimony: a handbook of psychological research and forensic practice. 2nd edition. (pp. 199-216). John Wily & Sons Ltd.
VERKAMPT, F., DODIER, O., MILNE, R., & GINET, M. (2021). An analysis of the quality of investigative interviews with children in France: age of the witness does matter. Police Practice and Research, 22:2, 1130-1154. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2019.1658581
Walker, N. E. (2002). Forensic interviews of children: the components of scientific validity and legal admissibility. Law and contemporary problems. 65(1), 149-178. Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol65/iss1/6
WATERHOUSE, G. G., RIDLEY, A. M., BULL, R., & WILCOCK, R. (2020). A study analysis for multiple interviewing of child witnesses. Child Abuse Review, 29, pp. 544-558. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2604
WESTERA, N. J., POWELL, M. B., MILNE, R., & GOODMAN-DELAHUNTY, J. (2016). Police interviewing of sexual assault victims: Current organisational responses and recommendations for improvement. In R. Bull and I. Blandon-Gitlin. (Eds.), Handbook of legal and investigative psychology. Routledge.
WINICK, B. J., & WEXLER, D. B. (2003). Judging in a therapeutic key. Carolina Academic.
Wright, R. & Powell, M. B. (2006). Investigative interviewers’ perceptions of their difficulty in adhering to open-ended questions with child witnesses. International Journal of Police Science & Management. 8(4), 316-325. https://doi.org/10.1350/ijps.2006.8.4.316
ZAVATTARO, M. S. (2018). Depoimento Especial: aspectos jurídicos e psicológicos de acordo com a lei 13431/2017 [Special Testimony: juridical and psychological aspects according to Law 13.431/2017]. D’Placido.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Os direitos autorais dos artigos publicados são do autor, com direitos do periódico sobre a primeira publicação.
Os autores somente poderão utilizar os mesmos resultados em outras publicações indicando claramente este periódico como o meio da publicação original. Se não houver tal indicação, considerar-se-á situação de autoplágio.
Portanto, a reprodução, total ou parcial, dos artigos aqui publicados fica sujeita à expressa menção da procedência de sua publicação neste periódico, citando-se o volume e o número dessa publicação. Para efeitos legais, deve ser consignada a fonte de publicação original.
Português (Brasil)
English
Español (España)
Assine a Revista: 
