Supreme Federal Court

Authors

  • Raphael Debes Chan Spinola Costa Universidade de São Paulo

Keywords:

Habeas corpus, Interlocutory appeal, Preliminary injunction, Freedom

Abstract

The Federal Supreme Court has consolidated its understanding that interlocutory appeals against single-judge decisions granting or denying preliminary injunctions in habeas corpus cases are inadmissible. This position, based on precedents dating back to the 1990s, sought to avoid successive appeals and preserve procedural speed. However, with Law 12.016/09, which allows appeals against preliminary decisions in writs of mandamus, part of the doctrine questions the maintenance of this prohibition in habeas corpus. It is argued that the reevaluation of the preliminary injunction request is essential to the protection of liberty, and that only appeals filed by the Attorney General's Office are inadmissible, as it is not a party to the petition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Raphael Debes Chan Spinola Costa, Universidade de São Paulo

Bacharel em Direito pela PUCSP. Pós-graduado em Processo Penal pela Universidade de Coimbra. Pós-graduado em Direito Penal Econômico e Corporativo pela Escola de Direito do Brasil. Advogado.

References

BRANCO, Tales Castelo. Teoria e prática dos recursos criminais. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2003.

GRINOVER, Ada Pellegrini; GOMES FILHO, Antonio Magalhães; FERNANDES, Antonio Scarance. Recursos no processo penal: teoria geral

dos recursos, recursos em espécie, ações de impugnação, reclamação aos tribunais. 4. ed. São Paulo: RT, 2005.

Published

2019-12-02

How to Cite

COSTA, Raphael Debes Chan Spinola. Supreme Federal Court. Boletim IBCCRIM, São Paulo, v. 27, n. 325, p. 30–32, 2019. Disponível em: https://publicacoes.ibccrim.org.br/index.php/boletim_1993/article/view/2338. Acesso em: 24 apr. 2026.

Issue

Section

Jurisprudência Comentada

Metrics

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.