Autonomous vehicles and collision of legal duties
a possible justification?
Views: 75Keywords:
Collision of duties, Autonomous vehicles, Accident algorithms, JustificationAbstract
The article analyzes, through literature research, the possibility of justification of accident algorithms in autonomous cars, especially cases involving the choice of a victim originally not hit, through the figure of the collision of duties. To this end, it proceeds in three moments: considerations about autonomous vehicles and presentation of the work case; explanation about the collision of duties; concretion of the collision of duties to the work case. At the end, it concluded that it is incompatible using that cause of justification in the case described.
Downloads
References
CAETANO, Matheus Almeida. Os algoritmos de acidente para carros autônomos e o Direito Penal: análises e perspectivas. Revista de Estudos Criminais, Porto Alegre, v. 19, n. 77, p. 149-192, 2020.
DIAS, Jorge de Figueiredo. Direito penal: parte geral: tomo I: questões fundamentais e a doutrina geral do crime. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2004.
ESTELLITA, Heloisa; LEITE, Alaor. Veículos autônomos e Direito Penal. JOTA, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.jota.info/opiniao-e-analise/colunas/penal-em-foco/veiculos-autonomos-e-direito-penal-20052019. Acesso em: 08 jul. 2021.
GURNEY, Jeffrey. Driving Into the Unknown: Examining the Crossroads of Criminal Law and Autonomous Vehicles. Wake Forest Journal of Law & Policy, v. 5, n. 2, p. 393-442, abr. 2015.
HERINGER JÚNIOR, Bruno. Colisão de deveres: a causa de justificação esquecida. Revista de Estudos Criminais, v. 12, n. 56, p. 113-130, 2015.
HEVELKE, Alexander; NIDA-RÜMELIN, Julian. Ethische Fragen zum Verhalten selbstfahrender Autos bei unausweichlichen Unfällen: Der Schutz von Unbeteiligten. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, v. 69, n. 2, p. 217-224, 2015.
MARKWALDER, Nora; SIMMLER, Monika. Roboterstrafrecht: zur strafrechtlichen Verantwortlichkeit von Robotern und künstlicher Intelligenz. Aktuelle juristische Praxis, AJP, p. 171-182, 2017.
MINORELLI, Lucas; CAETANO, Matheus Almeida. Vida contra vida e colisão de deveres no contexto de Covid-19: o que os médicos precisam saber. RDP, Brasília, v. 17, n. 94, p. 278-308, jul./ago. 2020.
ROXIN, Claus. Derecho penal: parte general: tomo I. Madri: Civitas Ediciones, 1997.
SANTONI DE SIO, Filippo. Killing by Autonomous Vehicles and the Legal Doctrine of Necessity. Ethic Theory and Moral Practice, n. 20, 411–429, 2017.
SHESTAK, Viktor; SHIRYAEV, Artur. Criminal Liability for Accidents Involving Self-Driving Cars: The German Experience. In: SHESTAK, Viktor; SHIRYAEV, Artur. Technology of the XXI century in jurisprudence: Materials of The Second International Scientific-Practical Conference. Yekaterinburg: Ural State Law University, 2020.
VIANNA, Rafael Ferreira. Contribuição da filosofia e da psicologia para a (não) justificação penal diante de dilemas morais. Revista de Estudos Criminais, v. 15, n. 60, p. 177-211, 2016.
WEIGEND, Thomas. Notstandsrecht für selbstfahrende Autos? Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik, v. 12, n. 10, p. 599-605, out. 2017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.
Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).
Português (Brasil)
English
Español (España)
