Chronology of memorials
portrait of Lava Jato's authoritarianism
Keywords:
Audi altera partem, Full defense, Chronology of speech, Habeas corpus, Habeas corpus. Control of the due process of lawAbstract
Although there is agreement on the fact that the defendant should be the last to speak in criminal proceedings, since this speech, which can influence the judge, translates the possibility to rebut the prosecutor’s allegations and thereby materialize the extension of the right of defense, the absence of legal writings about the chronology of “speeches” when there are whistleblowers and reported defendants should not create any difficulty to the realization of constitutional principles and guarantees. The reported defendant must always speak after the whistleblower. This article shows how an authoritarian interpretation of the legal regulation made a Car Wash judge realize the undue process of law. Also, it demonstrates the importance of habeas corpus as a legitimate mean of control of the due process of law to correct authoritarian deviations.
Downloads
References
Almeida, Canuto Mendes de. Princípios fundamentais do processo penal. São Paulo: Rev. dos Tribunais, 1973.
Tucci, Rogério Lauria. Direitos e garantias individuais no processo penal brasileiro. Ed. Saraiva, 1993.
Fernandes, Antonio Scarance. Processo penal constitucional. 6. ed. Revista dos Tribunais, 2010.
Grinover, Ada Pellegrini et al., Recursos no processo penal. 6. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais.
Badaró, Gustavo. Processo penal. Rio de Janeiro: Campus: Elsevier, 2012.
Franco, Alberto Silva. Código de processo penal e sua interpretação jurisprudencial. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2. ed. 2004. v. I.
Gomes Filho, Antonio Magalhães. Sobre o uso de algemas no julgamento pelo Júri. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Criminais, p. 110, dez.1992.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.
Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).
