Justiça negocial e acordo de não persecução penal

Views: 126

Authors

  • Dr. Ricardo Jacobsen Gloeckner Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS - Porto Alegre/RS

Keywords:

Processo penal, racionalidade neoliberal, acordo de não persecução penal

Abstract

The present article intends to investigate the emergence of plea-bargaining system and it’s impacts on criminal justice administration. Besides it examines how economic arguments are used in legitimizing negotiation in criminal procedure and the core results of this phenomena. Plea-bargaining is also understood as a neoliberal tool capable of undermine traditional adjudicative criminal process, generating what could be called an administrative management of criminal sanctions. Finally, after considering this wider scenario, the article demonstrates the impact and how close non prosecution agreements are related to neoliberal rationality and its pervasive effects of increasing managerial form of criminal procedure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Dr. Ricardo Jacobsen Gloeckner, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS - Porto Alegre/RS

Doutor em Direito pela Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR). Professor do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Penais da Pontifícia Universidade Católica. Professor Titular do Programa Maestría en Criminología Aplicada da Universidad San Carlos da Guatemala.

References

ADELSTEIN, Richard; MICELI, Thomas. Toward a Comparative Economics of Plea Bargain. In European Journal of Law and Economics. n. 11. v.1, 2001.

ALBERGARIA, Pedro Soares de. Plea Bargaining: aproximação à justiça negociada nos EUA. Coimbra: Almedina, 2007.

ALEXANDER, Michelle. A Nova Segregação: racismo e encarceramento em massa. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2017.

ALKON, Cynthia. Hard Bargaining in Plea Bargaining: when do prosecutors cross the line? In Nevada Law Journal. v. 17, 2017.

ALKON, Cynthia; SCHNEIDER, Andrea Kupfer. Bargaining in the Dark: the need for transparency and data in plea bargaining. In Texas A&M University School of Law. Research Paper nº 19-65, 2019.

ALSCHULER, Albert W. Plea Bargaining and It’s History. In Columbia Law Review. v. 79. n.1, 1979.

ALSCHULER, Albert. The Changing Plea Bargaining Debate. In California Law Review. n. 69. v. 652, 1981.

ALSCHULER, Albert. The Defense Attorney1s Role in Plea Bargaining. In The Yale Law Journal. v. 84. n. 6, 1975.

ALSCHULER, Albert. The Prosecutor’s Role in Plea Bargaining. In University of Chicago Law Review. n. 50. V. 36, 1968.

ALSCHULER, Albert. The Trial’s Judge Role in Plea Bargaining. In Columbia Law Review. n. 7. v.76, 1976.

BARKOW, Rachel. Separation of Powers and Criminal Procedure. In Stanford Law Review. n. 58. v. 998, 2006.

BEDÊ JÚNIOR, Américo; SENNA, Gustavo. Princípios do Processo Penal: entre o garantismo e a efetividade da sanção. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2009

BERDEJÓ, Carlos. Criminalizing Race: racial disparities in plea bargaining. In Boston College Law Review. v. 58, 2018.

BIBAS, Stephanos. Bringing Moral Values Into a Flawed Plea Bargainijng System. In Cornell Law Review. v. 88. 2003.

BIBAS, Stephanos. Designing Plea Bargaining from the Ground Up: accuracy and fairness without trials as backstops. In William & Mary Law Review. n. 4. v. 57, 2016.

BIBAS, Stephanos. Harmonizing Substantive-Criminal Law-Values and Criminal Procedure: the case of Alford and nolo contendere pleas. In Cornell Law Review. v. 88, 2003.

BIBAS, Stephanos. Plea Bargaining Outside the Shadow of Trial. In Harvard Law Review. v. 117. n. 8, 2004.

BIBAS, Stephanos. The Machinery of Criminal Justice. Oxford: New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.

BINDER, Alberto. Fundamentos Para a Reforma da Justiça Penal. Florianópolis: Empório do Direito, 2017.

BLUME, John H; HELM, Rebecca K. The Unexonerated: factually innocent defendants who plead guilty. In Cornell Law Faculty Working Papers. n. 113, 2014.

BOWERS, Josh. Punishing the Innocent. In University of Pennsylvania Law Review. v. 156, 2008.

BRANDALISE, Rodrigo da Silva. Justiça Penal Negociada: negociação de sentença criminal e princípios processuais relevantes. Curitiba: Juruá, 2016.

BRANDÃO, Nuno. Acordos Sobre a Sentença Penal. In Julgar. n. 25, 2015.

BROWN, Darryl K. Free Market Criminal Justice: how democracy and laissez faire undermine the rule of law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.

BRUNK, Conrad. The Problem of Voluntariness and Coercion in the Negotiated Plea. In Law & Society Review. n. 2. v.13, 1979.

CAEIRO, Pedro. Legalidade e Oportunidade: a perseguição penal entre o mito da “justiça absoluta” e o fetiche da “gestão eficiente” do sistema. Disponível em https://www.fd.uc.pt/~pcaeiro/2002_Legalidade_oportunidade.pdf. Acesso em 22.04.2019.

CALDWELL, Mitchell H. Coercive Plea Bargaining: the unrecognized scourge of the justice system. In Catholic University of Law Review. v. 63, 2012.

COVEY, Russell D. Signaling and Plea Bargaining’s Innocence Problem. In Washington & Lee Law Review. n. 66. v. 73, 2009.

DAMASKA, Mirjan. Aspectos Globales de la Reforma del Proceso Penal. Disponível em https://pt.scribd.com/document/64683436/Aspectos-Globales-Reforma-Processo-Penal-Damaska. Acesso em 19.08.2020.

DAMASKA, Mirjan. Negotiated Justice in International Criminal Courts. In THAMAN, Stephen. World Plea Bargaining: consensual procedures and the avoidance of the full criminal trial. Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2018.

DAVIS, Angela J. Arbitrary Justice: the power of the american prosecutor. Oxford: New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.

DERVAN, Lucian E. Overcriminalization 2.0: the symbiotic relation between plea bargaining and overcriminalization. In Journal of Law, Economics & Policy. n. 4. v.7, 2011.

DERVAN, Lucian E; EDKINS, Vanessa A. The Innocent Defendant’s Dilemma: an innovative empirical study of plea bargaining’s innocence problem. In The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. n. 1. v. 103, 2013.

DUBBER, Markus Dirk. American Plea Bargains, German Lay Judges, and the Crisis of Criminal Procedure. In Stanford Law Review. n. 49. v. 547, 1996-1997.

EASTERBROOK, Frank. Criminal Procedure as a Market System. In The Journal of Legal Studies. v. 12. n. 2, 1983.

EASTERBROOK, Frank. Plea Bargaining as Compromise. In Yale Law Journal. v. 101, 1992.

FEELEY, Malcolm. Legal Complexity ans the Transformation of Criminal Process: the origins of plea bargaining. In Israel Law Review. n. 31. v. 183, 1997.

FEELEY, Malcolm. The Process is the Punishment: handling cases in a lower criminal court. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1992.

FERRÉ OLIVÉ, Juan Carlos. El Plea Bargaining , o Cómo Pervertir la Justicia Penal a Través de un Sistema de Conformidades Low Cost. In Revista Electrónica de Ciencia Penal y Criminología. n. 06. v. 20, 2018.

FINE, Ralph Adam. Plea Bargaining: an unnecessary evil. In Marquette Law Review. n. 70. v. 715, 1987.

FISHER, Talia. The Boundaries of Plea Bargaining: negotiating the standard of proof. In The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. n. 4. v. 97, 2006-2007.

GARAPON, Antoine; PAPADOPOULOS. Julgar nos Estados Unidos e na França: cultura jurídica francesa e common law em uma perspectiva comparada. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2008.

GAROUPA, Nuno; STEPHEN, Frank H. Why Plea-Bargaining Fails to Achieve Results in So Many Criminal Justice Systems: a new framework for assessment. In Maastrich Journal of European Comparative Law. n. 15. v. 232, 2008.

GARRET, Brandon. Convicting the Innocent: Where criminal prosecutions go wrong. Cambridge: London: Harvard University Press, 2011.

GARRET, Brandon. Too Big to Jail: how prosecutors compromise with corporations. Cambridge: London: Harvard University Press, 2013.

GAZAL-AYAL, Oren. Partial Ban on Plea Bargains. In Cardozo Law Review. v. 27, 2006

GIACOMOLLI, Nereu José. Legalidade, Oportunidade e Consenso no Processo Penal na Perspectiva das Garantias Constitucionais. 3 ed. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2009.

GIFFORD, Donald G. Meaningful Reform of Plea Barganing: the control of prosecutorial discretion. In University of Illinois Law Review. n. 37, 1983.

GOLDSTEIN, Abraham S. Converging Criminal Justice Systems: guilty pleas and the public interest. In SMU Law Review. v. 43, 1996.

GRANDE, Elisabetta. Imitação e Direito: hipóteses sobre a circulação dos modelos. Porto Alegre: SAFE, 2009.

GRINOVER, Ada Pellegrini; GOMES FILHO, Antonio Magalhães; FERNANDES, Antonio Scarance; GOMES, Luz Flávio. Juizados Especiais Criminais: comentários à lei 9.099, de 26.09.1995. 5. Ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2005.

HESSICK III, Andrew F. Plea Bargaining and Convicting the Innocent: the role of the prosecutor, the defense counsel and the judge. In B.Y.U Journal of Public Law. n. 16. v. 189, 2002.

HOWE, Scott W. Value of Plea Bargaining. In Oklahoma Law Review. v. 58. n. 4, 2006.

KING, Nancy J; SOULE, David A; STEEN, Sara; WEIDNER, Robert R. When Processs Affects Punishment: diferences in sentences after guilty plea, bench trial, and jury trial in five guidelines states. In Columbia Law Review. v. 105, 2005.

KLEIN, Richard. Due Process Denied: judicial coercion in the plea bargaining process. In Hofstra Law Review. v. 32, 2003-2004.

KOHLER-HAUSSMANN, Issa. Misdemeanorland: criminal courts and social control in an age of broken Windows policing. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018.

LAIN, Corinna Barret. Accuracy Where it Matters: Brady v. Maryland in the plea bargaining context. In Washington University Law Quarterly. n. 1. v.80, 2002.

LANDES, William M. An Economic Analysis of the Courts. In BECKER, Gary; LANDES, William M. Essays in the Economics of Crime and Punishment. Cambridge: NBER, 1974.

LANGBEIN, John H. On the Myth of Written Constitutions: the disappearance of criminal jury trial. In Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy. n. 15. v. 119, 1992.

LANGBEIN, John. Tortura e Plea Bargaining. In GLOECKNER, Ricardo Jacobsen Sistemas Processuais Penais. Florianópolis: Empório do Direito, 2017.

LANGER, Maximo. Plea Bargaining, Conviction Without Trial and the Global Administratization of Criminal Convictions. Disponível em https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3453576. Acesso em 02.03.2020.

LANGER, Maximo. Rethinking Plea Bargaining: the practice and reform of prosecutorial adjudication in american criminal procedure. In American Jpurnal of Law & Criminology. v. 33, 2006.

LYNCH, David. The Impropriety of Plea Agreements: a tale of two counties. In Law & Social Inquiry. n. 1. v. 19, 1994.

LYNCH, Gerard E. Our Administrative System of Criminal Justice. In Fordham Law Review. v. 66, 1998.

LYNCH, Gerard E. Screening Versus Plea Bargaining: exactly what are we trading of? In Stanford Law Review. n. 55. v. 1399, 2003.

LYNCH, David. The Impropriety of Plea Agreements: a tale of two counties. In Law & Social Inquiry. n. 1. v. 19, 1994.

MIRANDA RODRIGUES, Anabela. Celeridade e Eficácia: uma opção político criminal. In Estudos em Homenagem ao Professor Doutor Jorge de Ribeiro Faria. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2003.

MORO, Sergio. Contra O Sistema de Corrupção. Rio de Janeiro: Primeira Pessoa, 2021.

NATAPOFF, Alexandra. Punishing Without Crime: how our massive misdmeanor system traps the innocent and makes America more inequal. New York: Basic Books, 2018.

OAKS, Dallin H. Studying the Exclusionary Rule in Search in Seizure. In The University of Chicago Law Review. v.37, 1970.

O’HEAR, Michael M. Plea Bargaining and Procedural Justice. In Georgia Law Review. n. 42. v. 407, 2008.

OSTROW, Eleanor J. The Case for Preplea Disclosure. In Yale Law Journal. v. 90, 1981.

PALMER, Jeff. Abolishing Plea Bargaining: an end to the same old song and dance. In American Journal of Criminal Law. v. 26, 1999.

POSNER, Richard. Economic Analysis of Law. 8 ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2011.

REINGANUM, Jennifer F. Plea Bargaining and Prosecution Discretion. In The American Economic Review. n. 4. v. 78, 1988.

RESNIK, Judith. Managerial Judges. In Harvard Law Review. n. 96. v. 376, 1982-1983.

ROSS, Jacqueline E. The Entrenched Position of Plea Bargaining in United States Legal Practice. In THAMAN, Stephen. World Plea Bargaining: consensual procedures and the avoidance of the full criminal trial. Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2018.

SANTORO, Antonio Eduardo Ramores. A Imbricação Entre Maxiprocessos e Colaboração Premiada: o deslocamento do centro informativo para a fase investigatória na Operação Lava Jato. In Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal. n. 1. v.6, 2020.

SAVITSKY, Douglas. Is Plea Bargaining a Rational Choice? Differential Subjective Decision Making as an Engine of Racial Stratification in the United States Prison System. Disponível em https://www.economyandsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/wp52_Savitsky_PleaBargaining.pdf. Acesso em 18.11.2020.

SCHER, Robert. The Emperor’s New Clothes: intelectual dishonesty and the unconstitutionality of plea bargaining. In Texas A&M Law Review. v. 385, 2015.

SCHNEIDER, Sydney. When Innocent Defendants Falsely Confess: analyzing the ramifications of entering Alford pleas in the context of burgeoning innocence movement. In Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. n. 103. v. 279, 2003.

SCHULHOFER, Stephen J. Plea Bargaining as Disaster. In Yale Law Journal. v. 101, 1992.

SCHUNEMANN, Bernd. La Reforma del Proceso Penal. Madrid: Dykinson, 2003.

SCHUNEMANN, Bernd. Um Olhar Crítico ao Modelo Processual Penal Norte-Americano. In SCHUNEMANN, Bernd. Estudos de Direito Penal, Direito Processual Penal e Filosofia do Direito. São Paulo: Marcial Pons, 2013.

SCOTT, Robert E.; STUNTZ, William J. Plea-Bargaining as Contract. In Yale Law Journal. v. 101, 1992.

SIMON, Jonathan. Beyond Tough on Crime: towards a better politics of prosecution. In LANGER, Maximo; SKLANSKY, David Alan. Prosecutors and Democracy: a cross-national study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

SLOBOGIN, Christopher. Plea Bargaining and the Substantive and Procedural Goals of Criminal Justice: from retribution and adversarialism to preventive justice and hybrid-inquisitorialism. In William & Mary Law Review. v. 54, 2016.

SMITH, Douglas A. The Plea Bargaining Controversy. In The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. n. 3. v. 77, 1986.

SUXBERGER, Antonio Henrique Graciano; GOMES FILHO, Demerval Farias. Funcionalização e Expansão do Direito Penal: o direito penal negocial. In Revista de Direito Internacional. n.1. v.13, 2016.

STUNTZ, William J. The Collapse of American Criminal Justice. Cambridge: London: Harvard University Press, 2011.

STUNTZ, William J. The Political Constitution of Criminal Justice. In Harvard Law Review. n. 3. V119, 2006.

THAMAN, Stephen. A Typology of Consensual Criminal Procedures: an historical and comparative perspective on the theory and practice of avoiding the full criminal trial. In THAMAN, Stephen. World Plea Bargaining: consensual procedures and the avoidance of the full criminal trial. Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2018.

THAMAN, Stephen C. Introduction. In THAMAN, Stephen. World Plea Bargaining: consensual procedures and the avoidance of the full criminal trial. Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2018.

VASCONCELLOS, Vinícius Gomes de. Barganha e Justiça Criminal Negocial: análise das tendências de expansão dos espaços de consenso no processo penal brasileiro. 2 ed. Belo Horizonte: D’Plácido, 2019.

VIANO, Emilio C. Plea Bargaining in the United States: a perversion of justice. In ERES. n. 1. v. 83, 2012.

WACQUANT, Loic. Punir os Pobres: a nova gestão da miséria nos Estados Unidos. 3 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Revan, 2013

WALKER, Samuel. Taming the System: the controlo f discretion in criminal justice 1950-1990. Orford: New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.

WAN, Tina. Yhe Unnecessary Evil of Plea Bargaining: an unconstitutional conditions problem and a not-so-least restrictive alternative. In Review of Law and Social Justice. v. 17, 2007.

WEBB, Lindsay. The Immortal Accusation. In Washington Law Review. v. 90. n. 1853, 2015.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-11

How to Cite

Jacobsen Gloeckner, D. R. (2024). Justiça negocial e acordo de não persecução penal. Brazilian Journal of Criminal Science, 191(n. 191), 329–373. Retrieved from https://publicacoes.ibccrim.org.br/index.php/RBCCRIM/article/view/214

Issue

Vol. 191 No. n. 191 (2022): RBCCrim - Dossiê Especial: "Acordo de Não Persecução Penal e Justiça Negocial”

Section

Processo penal

License

Os direitos autorais dos artigos publicados são do autor, com direitos do periódico sobre a primeira publicação.

Os autores somente poderão utilizar os mesmos resultados em outras publicações indicando claramente este periódico como o meio da publicação original. Se não houver tal indicação, considerar-se-á situação de autoplágio.

Portanto, a reprodução, total ou parcial, dos artigos aqui publicados fica sujeita à expressa menção da procedência de sua publicação neste periódico, citando-se o volume e o número dessa publicação. Para efeitos legais, deve ser consignada a fonte de publicação original.

Metrics