Parliamentary Committee of Inquiry (Function – Jurisdiction – Investigative Nature)

Authors

  • Rogério Lauria Tucci Universidade de São Paulo, USP, Brasil image/svg+xml

Keywords:

Parliamentary committee of inquiry, Right to silence, Self-incrimination, Private documents, Constitutional guarantees

Abstract

The legal opinion examines the procedural situation of Cláudio Francisco Vieira before the Joint Parliamentary Committee of Inquiry of the National Congress, which requested him to produce personal documents. The author argues that the CPI has an administrative and investigative, not jurisdictional, character, and that its powers are restricted to those expressly provided by law: ordering investigations, taking statements, examining witnesses and requesting documents from public bodies, not from private individuals. He concludes that the client, formally treated as a witness, has the right to silence, to legal assistance and to adversarial proceedings, and may refuse to produce private documents, due to lack of legal provision and based on art. 5, II, of the Federal Constitution, with the threat of legal penalties in case of refusal being illegal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Rogério Lauria Tucci, Universidade de São Paulo, USP, Brasil

Professor Associado, regente da disciplina Direito Processual Penal nos Cursos de Graduação e Pós-graduação da Faculdade de Direito da USP.

References

-

Published

1994-04-01

How to Cite

TUCCI, Rogério Lauria. Parliamentary Committee of Inquiry (Function – Jurisdiction – Investigative Nature). Brazilian Journal of Criminal Science, São Paulo, v. 6, n. 6, p. 171–185, 1994. Disponível em: https://publicacoes.ibccrim.org.br/index.php/RBCCRIM/article/view/3314. Acesso em: 20 oct. 2026.
Views 20 Downloads 13