The non-criminal prosecution agreement and continued crime

Views: 46

Authors

  • Alex Feitosa de Oliveira Universidade de Coimbra
  • Rafael Ribeiro Meireles Universidade de Fortaleza, UNIFOR, Fortaleza/PE, Brasil

Keywords:

Business justice, Non-criminal prosecution agreement, Criminal continuity

Abstract

The non-criminal prosecution agreement was introduced in the brazilian Criminal Procedure Code by Law 13.964/19, having as a requirement for its proposition the absence of proof elements that indicate the presence of habitual, repeated or professional criminal conduct. The problem that the present investigation intends to clarify is the attempt to define the type of agent the legislator wanted to obstruct the agreement by providing ​     ​such imprecise terms and, mainly, to know if these include the continued crime, based on an interpretation teleological-axiological of the Law 13.964/19, the analysis of past jurisprudence on related topics, as well as comparative law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
11%
33%
Days to publication 
0
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
Instituto Brasileiro de Ciências Criminais
Publisher 
IBCCRIM

Author Biographies

Alex Feitosa de Oliveira , Universidade de Coimbra

Doutorando em ciências jurídico-criminais pela Universidade de Coimbra. Professor do Centro Universitário Unifanor. Defensor Público Federal.  

Rafael Ribeiro Meireles, Universidade de Fortaleza, UNIFOR, Fortaleza/PE, Brasil

Pós-graduando em Direito Penal e Processo Penal pela Unifor. Advogado.  

Downloads

Published

2024-07-22

How to Cite

Feitosa de Oliveira , A., & Ribeiro Meireles, R. (2024). The non-criminal prosecution agreement and continued crime . Boletim IBCCRIM, 30(353), 13–15. Retrieved from https://publicacoes.ibccrim.org.br/index.php/boletim_1993/article/view/1456

Issue

Vol. 30 No. 353 (2022): Boletim IBCCRIM - Abril

Section

Doutrina

License

Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.

Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).