Digital forensics tools

development and concerns In the context of law enforcement

Views: 7

Authors

  • José Ricardo Marcondes Ramos Universidade de São Paulo, USP, Brasil.

Keywords:

Criminal law, Forensic tools, Digital investigation, Law enforcement

Abstract

Despite its use for criminal misbehaviour, technology is contributing to the improvement of both old and new investigative methods. Combined with the rising incidence of cybercrime, the increasing adoption of new digital devices by society and the enormous amount of digital data produced by them is fostering the development of the new and independent scientific field of digital forensics, specialized on the production, collection and analysis of such data and other computer powered investigative tasks. In this paper, we will focus on forensic investigation methods and digital forensic tools aided by new technologies with an overview of the forensic science and the development of tools and investigative methods powered by computers, as well as the usage and purposes of digital forensic tools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

José Ricardo Marcondes Ramos, Universidade de São Paulo, USP, Brasil.

Doutorando em ciências jurídico-criminais na Universidade de Coimbra. Mestre em Direito Penal e Graduado em Direito pela USP. Pós-graduado pelo Instituto de Direito Bancário, da Bolsa e dos Seguros. Investigador do Instituto Jurídico da Universidade de Coimbra. Advogado.

References

BOLTON, R. J., HAND, D. J., PROVOST, F., BREIMAN, L., Statistical Fraud Detection – A Review, Statistical Science, Vol. 17, No. 3 (2002), Institute of Mathematical Statistics, p. 235-249.

FERGUSON, R.I., RENAUD, K., WILFORD, S. and IRONS, A. PRECEPT: a framework for ethical digital forensics investigations, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2020, Vol. 21 No. 2, p. 257-290.

GEE, Sunder. Fraud and fraud detection: a data analytics approach. New Jersey: Ed. Wiley, 2015.

KUMARI Tiwari, Reshma; DEBNATH, Jasojit (2017). Forensic accounting: a blend of knowledge. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 25(1), 73–85.

LEE, Jae-Ung; SOH, Woo-Young. Comparative analysis on integrated digital forensic tools for digital forensic investigation. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, 834.

LOUWERS, Timothy J. (2015). The past, present, and future (?) of crime-related forensic accounting methodology. Accounting Research Journal, 28(1), 4–9.

NETHERLANDS REGISTER OF COURT EXPERTS NRGD, 2016. Standards 008.0 Digital Forensics. Technical Report Netherlands Register of Court Experts.

NIKKEL, Bruce. Fintech forensics: Criminal investigation and digital evidence in financial technologies. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, (2020).

OLIVEIRA JÚNIOR, Edson; ZORZO, Avelino F.; NEU, Charles Varlei (2020). Towards a conceptual model for promoting digital forensics experiments. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 35.

V. RAJIČ, M. MILENKOVIĆ and G. VOJKOVIĆ. Digital forensics appliance in corporate ecosystem considering limitations in the EU legal framework, 2020 43rd International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO), 2020, p. 2094-2100.

VAN BAAR, R.B.; VAN BEEK, H.M.A.; VAN EIJK, E.J. (2014). Digital Forensics as a Service: A game changer. Digital Investigation, 11, S54–S62.

VAN BEEK, H.M.A.; VAN DEN BOS, J.; BOZTAS, A.; VAN EIJK, E. J.; SCHRAMP, R.; UGEN, M. Digital forensics as a service: Stepping up the game. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, Vol. 35, 2020.

WU, Tina; BREITINGER, Frank; O'SHAUGHNESSY, Stephen (2020). Digital forensic tools: Recent advances and enhancing the status quo. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 34.

Published

2024-07-25

How to Cite

Marcondes Ramos, J. R. (2024). Digital forensics tools: development and concerns In the context of law enforcement. Boletim IBCCRIM, 30(361), 9–12. Retrieved from https://publicacoes.ibccrim.org.br/index.php/boletim_1993/article/view/1547

Metrics