The chain of custody of evidence collected on mobile recording devices

Views: 77

Authors

  • Lurã Azevedo de Oliveira Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, UFRN, Brasil.
  • Lucas Arieh Bezerra Medina Universidade de São Paulo, USP, Brasil.

Keywords:

Chain of custody, Digital evidence, Illicit evidence

Abstract

The present work intends to reflect on the specifics of the chain of custody in digital evidence. Throughout the text, it will be discussed how the chain of custody of evidence included by Law 13.964, of 2019, although insufficient, can be used to guarantee the legitimacy of the use of evidence obtained through electronic devices. For this, forensic practices and recommendations related to the collection of non-analog evidence will be analyzed. Finally, the consequences of an incorrect observation of the custody will be defined, arguing for the need to recognize and declare the evidence as illicit and remove it from the records, including everything that resulted from it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
11%
33%
Days to publication 
0
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
Instituto Brasileiro de Ciências Criminais
Publisher 
IBCCRIM

Author Biographies

Lurã Azevedo de Oliveira, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, UFRN, Brasil.

Graduando em Direito. 

Lucas Arieh Bezerra Medina, Universidade de São Paulo, USP, Brasil.

Mestrando em Criminologia pela USP. Pós-graduado em Direito Penal e Criminologia pelo Instituto de Criminologia e Política Criminal (ICPC). Advogado. 

Downloads

Published

2024-07-26

How to Cite

Azevedo de Oliveira, L., & Bezerra Medina, L. A. (2024). The chain of custody of evidence collected on mobile recording devices . Boletim IBCCRIM, 31(364), 16–19. Retrieved from https://publicacoes.ibccrim.org.br/index.php/boletim_1993/article/view/1584

Issue

Vol. 31 No. 364 (2023): Boletim IBCCRIM - Março

Section

Doutrina

License

Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.

Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).