Evidence obtained from the freezing of internet accounts content
was justice ricardo lewandowski’s decision in hc 222.141 correct?
Views: 14Keywords:
Criminal procedure, Evidences, Virtual content freezing, Civil Rights Framework for the Internet, Right to privacy, Theory of nullitiesAbstract
In the judgment of HC 222.141, Supreme Court Justice Ricardo Lewandowski annulled all the evidence produced from the freezing of the contents of internet accounts linked to the person under investigation, whose request for the triggering of the measure was formulated by the Public Prosecutor’s Office based on the provisions of Art. 13, § 2, of Law 12.965/2014, the so-called “Civil Rights Framework for the Internet”. In this article, we ponder on the correctness of the that, under the major allegation of violation of the fundamental right to privacy, considered illegal the fulfillment of the measure by internet providers, even if it was succeeded by judicial authorization, under legal the legal terms. It should be noted that the supreme position is not in line with the practice of criminal evidence, notably because it is a solution that conflicts with the system of procedural nullities and its principles.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.
Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).