The need for motivation in generic prison decrees in light of the Anticrime Package (Law 13,694/2019)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17281278Keywords:
criminal procedure, judicial decision, reasoning, imprisonment, CPPAbstract
The article examines the amendments introduced by Law 13,694/2019 (the “Anticrime Package”) to the Brazilian Code of Criminal Procedure, in alignment with the constitutional guarantee established in Article 93, IX, of the Federal Constitution. The legislative reform underscores the duty to provide adequate reasoning in judicial decisions ordering or upholding pretrial detention. Particular attention is given to the inclusion of paragraph 2 in Article 315 of the Code, which explicitly defines scenarios that characterize insufficient reasoning, such as generic, formulaic justifications, or those disconnected from the specific factual context. To illustrate the practical implications of these requirements, the article discusses recent rulings from the Federal Supreme Court and the Superior Court of Justice that address the lack or inadequacy of judicial reasoning in preventive detention orders.
Downloads
References
BADARÓ, Gustavo Henrique Righi Ivahy. Vícios de motivação da sentença penal: ausência de motivação, motivação contraditória, motivação implícita e motivação per relationem. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Criminais, São Paulo, v. 10, n. 38, p. 122-141, abr./jun. 2002.
BIAZI, Roberto Portugal de. Da garantia de motivação das decisões penais à luz das inovações trazidas pela Lei Anticrime. Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais, Belo Horizonte, v. 5, n. 1, p. 233-258, 2020. https://doi.org/10.46274/1809-192XRICP2020v5p233-258
FREIRE JÚNIOR, Américo Bedê. Repercussões em matéria probatória do novo CPC no Processo Penal Brasileiro. In: CABRAL, Antonio do Passo; PACELLI, Eugênio; SCHIETTI CRUZ, Rogerio. (org.). Processo Penal. Salvador: JusPodivm, 2016. v. 13, p. 261-276.
GALVÃO, Danyelle da Silva, PEIXOTO JÚNIOR, Hélio, LOBO, Ricardo. O artigo 489 do novo Código de processo civil (Lei 13.105/2015) e suas implicações no direito processual penal. Revista dos Tribunais, São Paulo, v. 105, n. 971, 2016.
GALVÃO, Danyelle; PEIXOTO JÚNIOR, Hélio. Lei Anticrime inibe ‘copia e cola’ judicial. O Globo, 18 fev. 2020. Disponível em: https://oglobo.globo.com/opiniao/artigo-lei-anticrime-inibe-copia-cola-judicial-24254238. Acesso em: 10 jul. 2025.
GOMES FILHO, Antonio Magalhães. A motivação das decisões judiciais. 2. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2013.
GRINOVER, Ada Pellegrini. Novas tendências do Direito Processual (De acordo com a Constituição de 1988). Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária, 1990.
PINTO, Marcos Vinícius, FREIRE JÚNIOR, Américo Bedê. A aplicação do art. 489, § 1º, do CPC ao processo penal. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Criminais, São Paulo, v. 152, n. 152, p. 315-346, fev. 2019.
IGARTUA SALAVERRIA, Juan. La motivación de las sentencias, imperativo constitucional. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 2003.
SCHIETTI CRUZ, Rogério. Dever de motivação das decisões judiciais no novo Código de Processo Civil e reflexos na jurisdição criminal. In: CABRAL, Antonio do Passo; PACELLI, Eugênio; SCHIETTI CRUZ, Rogério. (org.). Processo Penal. Salvador: JusPodivm, 2016, v. 13, p. 327-356.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Profa. Dra. Danyelle da Silva Galvão
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.
Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).
