Incompatibilities of art. 2, § 9, of Law 15,358/2026 with the legal framework governing pretrial detention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21378233Keywords:
pretrial detention, precautionary justification, precautionary automationAbstract
The present article analyzes the compatibility of Article 2, § 9, of Law 15,358/2026 with the constitutional model of pretrial detention in Brazilian criminal procedure. It examines whether the provision of “legal sufficiency” for the decree of preventive detention complies with the requirement of concrete judicial reasoning established by the Federal Constitution and the Brazilian Code of Criminal Procedure. The study addresses the exceptional nature of pretrial detention, the constitutional duty to state reasons in judicial decisions, and the prohibition of precautionary automatism based on abstract presumptions of dangerousness. It argues that replacing the concrete demonstration of periculum libertatis with normative presumptions of dangerousness weakens the accusatorial structure of criminal procedure and undermines the exceptional character of personal precautionary measures.
Downloads
References
BADARÓ, Gustavo. Processo penal e criminalidade organizada. Revista Jurídica Luso-Brasileira, Lisboa, ano 1, n. 1, p. 99-129, 2015.
BRASIL. Lei nº 15.358, de 24 de março de 2026. Dispõe sobre o marco legal do combate ao crime organizado no Brasil. Brasília: Presidência da República, 2026. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15358.htm. Acesso em: 18 maio 2026.
CARNELUTTI, Francesco. As misérias do processo penal. Tradução de José Antônio Cardinalli. 1. ed. Curitiba: Edijur, 2022.
COUTINHO, Jacinto Nelson de Miranda. Sistema acusatório: cada parte no lugar constitucionalmente demarcado. Revista de Informação Legislativa, Brasília, v. 46, n. 183, p. 103-115, jul./set., 2009.
DINAMARCO, Cândido Rangel; BADARÓ, Gustavo Henrique Righi Ivahy; LOPES, Bruno Vasconcelos Carrilho. Teoria geral do processo. 32. ed. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2020.
LOPES JR., Aury. Direito processual penal. 22. ed. São Paulo: SaraivaJur, 2025.
MORAIS DA ROSA, Alexandre. Guia compacto do processo penal conforme a Teoria dos Jogos. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Matheus Guedes, Rafaela Alban
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.
Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).
