Criminal Organizations and the Anticrime brazilian Bill:

the unconstitutionality of the generic supressi

Views: 91

Authors

Keywords:

Prison law, parole, criminal organizations, unconstitutionality

Abstract

The aim of this brief study is to present, on the one hand, an explanatory hypothesis, and on the other, legal arguments for the unconstitutionality and the criminal policy inadequacy of the new article 2, § 9, of Law 12.850/13, which contains confusing wording and probably constitutes the most serious change in the theme of prisoners’ rights, among all those promoted by Law 13.964/2019 (“Anticrime brazilian Bill”). The explanatory hypothesis would be the reiteration of ideological adherence to the most contested version among the theories of deterrence, as well as the use of a malleable theory of prison law as a focal point for the upsurge of criminal institutes promoted by the Law 13.964/2019. The grounds for claiming unconstitutionality would be, mainly, the violation of the principles of individualization, taxativity and proportionality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Prof. Dr. André Ribeiro Giamberardino, Universidade Federal do Paraná - UFPR - Curitiba/PR

Defensor Público do Estado do Paraná e Professor dos Programas de Pós-graduação em Direito e em Sociologia da UFPR. Coordenador da Clínica de Acesso à Justiça e Educação nas Prisões da UFPR e do Núcleo de Política Criminal e Execução Penal da DPPR. Visiting Scholar" na Columbia Law School. Link Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/0997816643711510

 

 

Me. Luis Renan Coletti, Universidade Federal do Paraná - UFPR - Curitiba/PR

Mestrando em Direito pela UFPR. Bacharel em Direito pela UFPR. Membro-autor da Clínica de Acesso à Justiça e Educação nas Prisões da UFPR. Lattes CV: http://lattes.cnpq.br/7795772839583305

 

 

Paula Martins Caçola, UNICURITIBA - Curitiba/PR

Pós-Graduanda lato sensu em Direito Penal e Direito Processual Penal pela ABDConst. Bacharel em Direito pelo UNICURITIBA. Lattes CV: http://lattes.cnpq.br/2429542915308017

 

References

ADORNO, Luís. ‘Não à facção’: Com cartazes, MJ quer convencer preso a não integrar bandos. UOL, São Paulo, 18 fev. 2020. Disponível em: < https://noticias.uol.com.br/cotidiano/ultimas-noticias/2020/02/18/ campanha-diga-nao-a-faccao-em-presidios-comecara-na-semana-do-carnaval.htm >. Acesso: 12 mar. 2020.

BECCARIA, C. Dos delitos e das penas. Tradução de Lúcia Guidicini, Alessandro Berti Contessa, Revisão de Roberto Leal Ferreira. 3. ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2005 [1764].

BECKER, Gary S. Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy 76 (2), pp. 169–217, 1968.

BENTHAM, Jeremy. Uma Introdução aos Princípios da Moral e da Legislação. Tradução de Luiz João Baraúna. 3ª Ed. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1984 [1789].

CACICEDO, Patrick. Notas críticas sobre a execução penal no Projeto “Anticrime”. Boletim IBCCRIM, v. 27, abr. 2019, pp. 21-22.

DIAS, Camila Nunes; MANSO, Bruno Paes. “PCC, sistema prisional e gestão do novo mundo do crime no Brasil”. Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública, São Paulo, v. 11, n. 2, pp. 10-29, 2017.

NAGIN, Daniel S. Deterrence in the Twenty-First Century. Crime and Justice, Chicago, v. 42, n. 1, pp. 199-263, 2013.

PARANÁ. Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Paraná. Autos de Ação Penal nº. 0000537-77.2016.8.16.0013. 8ª Vara Criminal de Curitiba/PR.

ROIG Rodrigo Duque Estrada. Execução Penal: teoria crítica. 3. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva Jur, 2017.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-02

How to Cite

Ribeiro Giamberardino, P. D. A., Renan Coletti, M. L., & Martins Caçola, P. (2020). Criminal Organizations and the Anticrime brazilian Bill: : the unconstitutionality of the generic supressi. Boletim IBCCRIM, 28(331), 30–32. Retrieved from https://publicacoes.ibccrim.org.br/index.php/boletim_1993/article/view/549

Issue

Vol. 28 No. 331 (2020): Boletim especial: Lei Anticrime (Parte 2)

Section

Doutrina

License

Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.

Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).