Negative theory of the punishment: a small observation for a greater clarity

Views: 114

Authors

Keywords:

Positive theories of punishment, Hypothesis, Negative theory of punishment, Critique

Abstract

If punishment is so important to Criminal Law that (in Portuguese) it derives its own name ‒ Penal Law ‒ from it, it seems undeniable that the study of the theoretical constructions on punishment is essential to the study of Criminal Law. In this scope, this paper’s objective is to put a spotlight on the positive and negative theories of punishment, especially the contrasts between what their names may imply and what contents really are, focusing in the negative theory of punishment, in order to clarify some issues.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Me. Thiago Rocha de Rezende, Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ - Rio de janeiro/RJ

Doutorando e Mestre em Direito Penal pela UERJ. Advogado. Lattes CV: http://lattes.cnpq.br/1955187887202661

 

 

References

BUNGE, Mario. La ciencia: su método y su filosofia. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana, 2001.

CARVALHO, Salo. Penas e medidas de segurança no direito penal brasileiro: fundamentos e aplicação judicial. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2013.

LAKATOS, Eva Maria; MARCONI, Marina de Andrade. Metodologia científica. São Paulo: Atlas, 1991.

LUCCHESI, Guilherme Brenner. A punição da culpa a título de dolo: o problema da chamada “cegueira deliberada”. 2017. 366 f. Tese (Doutorado em Direito do Estado) – Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, 2017.

ROXIN, Claus. Derecho penal, parte general, tomo I: fundamentos. Trad. Diego-Manuel Luzón Peña, Miguel Díaz y Garcia Conlledo e Javier de Vicente Remesal. Madrid: Civitas, 1997.

SANTOS, Juarez Cirino dos. Direito penal: parte geral. São Paulo: Tirant lo Blanch, 2020.

ZAFFARONI, Eugenio Raúl; BATISTA, Nilo et al. Direito penal brasileiro, volume I. Rio de Janeiro: Revan, 2003.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-25

How to Cite

Rocha de Rezende, M. T. (2023). Negative theory of the punishment: a small observation for a greater clarity. Boletim IBCCRIM, 31(366), 19–21. Retrieved from https://publicacoes.ibccrim.org.br/index.php/boletim_1993/article/view/558

Issue

Vol. 31 No. 366 (2023): Boletim IBCCRIM - Maio

Section

Doutrina

License

Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.

Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).