Who has occupied the centrality of the solution of domestic conflict in restorative justice experiences?

Views: 215

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8370408

Keywords:

National Council of Justice, Domestic and family violence, Judicial power

Abstract

With the introduction of Restorative Justice in the agenda of the Judiciary, a field of disputes has clearly opened up. In the context of domestic violence, it has been applied and has also generated controversy. On the one hand, the need to respond to the domestic conflict, and on the other, who will be at the center of the solution. In this article, the restorative lens will be on who occupies the centrality of the solution to domestic conflict, based on an analysis of three institutional documents of the National Council of Justice: “Piloting Restorative Justice: The role of the Judiciary” (2018); “Between retributive and restorative practices: The Maria da Penha Law and the advances and challenges of the Judiciary” (2018), and “Mapping of Restorative Justice Programs” (2019). From the analysis of institutional documents, it is clear that women are not central to restorative procedures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dra. Luanna Tomaz de Souza, Universidade Federal do Pará - UFPA - Belém/PA

Doutora em Direito, Justiça e Cidadania no Séc. XXI pela Universidade de Coimbra (2016). Professora do Instituto de Ciências Jurídicas da Universidade Federal do Pará. Advogada. Lattes CV: http://lattes.cnpq.br/5883415348673630

Dra. Lorena Santiago Fabeni, Universidade Federal do Pará - UFPA - Belém/PA

Doutora em Direitos Humanos pela Universidade Federal do Pará (2023). Advogada. Lattes CV: http://lattes.cnpq.br/8479788871403626

References

ANDRADE, Vera Regina Pereira de (coord.). Pilotando a Justiça Restaurativa: O papel do Poder Judiciário. Brasília: Conselho Nacional de Justiça, 2018.

BRASIL. Lei nº 11.340, de 07 de agosto de 2006. Dispõe sobre a criação dos Juizados de Violência Doméstica e Familiar contra a Mulher; altera o Código de Processo Penal, o Código Penal e a Lei de Execução Penal. Brasília: DF: Presidência da República, 2006. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2004-2006/2006/Lei/L11340.htm. Acesso em: 02 fev. 2023.

CONSELHO NACIONAL DE JUSTIÇA. Mapeamento dos Programas de Justiça Restaurativa. Brasília, DF: CNJ, Poder Judiciário, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.cnj.jus.br/wp-content/uploads/conteudo/arquivo/2019/06/8e6cf55c06c5593974bfb8803a8697f3.pdf. Acesso em: 02 fev. 2023.

FABENI, Lorena Santiago. O uso da justiça restaurativa pelo poder judiciário nas violências cometidas contra as mulheres. 2023. Tese (Doutorado em Direito) – Universidade Federal do Pará. 2023.

MELLO; Marília Montenegro Pessoa de; ROSENBLATT, Fernanda Cruz da Fonseca Carolina Salazar; MEDEIROS, L’Armée Queiroga de. Relatório Analítico Propositivo Justiça Pesquisa Direitos e Garantias Fundamentais entre práticas Retributivas e Restaurativas: a Lei Maria da Penha e os avanços e desafios do Poder Judiciário. Brasília: Universidade Católica de Pernambuco e Conselho Nacional de Justiça, 2018.

ZEHR, Howard. Trocando as lentes: um novo foco sobre o crime e a justiça. São Paulo: Palas Athena, 2008.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-03

How to Cite

Tomaz de Souza, D. L., & Santiago Fabeni, D. L. (2023). Who has occupied the centrality of the solution of domestic conflict in restorative justice experiences?. Boletim IBCCRIM, 31(371), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8370408

Issue

Vol. 31 No. 371 (2023): Boletim IBCCRIM - Outubro

Section

Doutrina

License

Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.

Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).