The illegality of the evidence in the accusatory system: The impartiality and the duty of the judge in the face of inadmissible evidence due to the changes promoted by the anti-crime package in the brazilian criminal procedure code

Views: 11

Authors

  • Rodrigo Teles de Oliveira Universidade de São Paulo - USP - São Paulo/SP

Keywords:

Inadmissible evidence, Impartiality of the judge, Accusatory system, Brazilian Criminal Procedure Code, Anti-Crime Package

Abstract

The Anti-Crime Package brought important changes to the brazilian Criminal Procedure Code – CPC. As for the changes promoted on the theory of the criminal evidence, it is noted that the legislator sought, as an expression of the accusatory system, to give priority to the impartiality of the judge. Through an analysis of the current procedural rules and the collection of bibliographic material, the study aimed to understand the real need for the insertion of § 5º in art. 157 of the CPC. It has been clear to understand that, although it tries too much to give primacy to the principle of impartiality, the changes arising from the Anti-Crime Package on the subject related to the theory of evidence in criminal proceedings are in conflict with other principles of Criminal Procedure Law of equal importance. It is clear that this provision is unreasonable in criminal proceedings in the search for a fair decision.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Rodrigo Teles de Oliveira, Universidade de São Paulo - USP - São Paulo/SP

Doutorando em Direito Penal pela Universidade de São Paulo - USP. Mestre em História do Pensamento Jurídico: História das Ideias Penais pela Faculdade Damas da Instrução Cristã - FADIC (2017). Advogado e Pesquisador. Lattes CV: http://lattes.cnpq.br/4157697393961985

References

ARMENTA DEU, Teresa. Lecciones de Derecho Procesal Penal. 3 ed. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2007.

BARREIROS, José Antonio. Processo Penal. Coimbra: Almedina, 1981.

CORDERO, Franco. Procedimiento Penal. v.I. Trad. de Jorge Guerrero. Temis: Santa Fé de Bogotá, 2000.

COUTINHO, Jacinto Nelson de Miranda. Sistema acusatório: cada parte no lugar constitucionalmente demarcado. In Revista de Informação Legislativa. Brasília, Ano 46, nº 183, jul./set. 2009, p. 103-115.

FLORIAN, Eugenio. Principi di Diritto Processuale Penale. 2 ed. Torino: Giappichelli, 1932.

IASEVOLI, Clelia. La nullità nel Sistema Processuale Penale. Napoli: CEDAM, 2008.

ILLUMINATTI, Giulio. El Sistema Acusatorio en Italia. In BACHMAIER WINTER, Lorena (coord). Proceso Penal y Sistemas Acusatorios. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2008.

LOZZI, Gilberto. I Principi Dell’Oralità e del Contradittorio nel Processo Penale. In Rivista Italiana di Diritto e Procedura Penale. a. XL. Milano: Giuffrè, 1997. p. 669 – 693.

MAIER, Julio B. Derecho Procesal Penal I: fundamentos. 2 ed. Buenos Aires: Editores del Puerto, 2004.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-11

How to Cite

Teles de Oliveira, R. (2024). The illegality of the evidence in the accusatory system: The impartiality and the duty of the judge in the face of inadmissible evidence due to the changes promoted by the anti-crime package in the brazilian criminal procedure code. Boletim IBCCRIM, 28(335), 22–25. Retrieved from https://publicacoes.ibccrim.org.br/index.php/boletim_1993/article/view/919

Issue

Vol. 28 No. 335 (2020): Boletim IBCCRIM - Outubro

Section

Doutrina

License

Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.

Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).