The principle of insignificance and the reiteration of the conduct in the non prosecution agreement
Views: 37Keywords:
Principle of insignificance, Reiteration of the conduct, Non prosecution agreementAbstract
Given the provision of novel art. 28-A, § 2, II, of the Criminal Procedure Code, the interaction between the institutes of reiteration of conduct and the principle of insignificance, already present in forensic daily life, is fundamental for the exegesis of this rule. In this light, the reiteration of the investigated conduct, a broader concept than recidivism and bad antecedents, implies the impossibility of concluding the non prosecution agreement, except if the records found point to criminally insignificant facts. Thus, the technical sense of expression should be privileged, in order to enable the conclusion of the agreement to those who, although showing signs of reiteration of conduct in the last five years, in these occurrences there has been the application of insignificance and the event is not present. inserted in a single factual context, in the face of the same victim, with significant final result.
Downloads
References
COSTA, Helena Regina Lobo da. Comentários ao art. 155. In: REALE JÚNIOR, Miguel (coord.). Direito Penal: jurisprudência em debate. 2. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2016.
GOMES, Luiz Flávio. Princípio da insignificância e outras excludentes de tipicidade. 3. ed. São Paulo: Ed. Revista dos Tribunais, 2013.
GUADANHIN, Gustavo de Carvalho. Princípio da insignificância: uma análise dogmática e sua aplicação nos delitos contra a Administração Pública. Curitiba: Juruá, 2018.
LIMA, Renato Brasileiro de. Manual de Processo Penal. 8. ed. Salvador: JusPodivm, 2020.
PASCOLATI JÚNIOR, Ulisses Augusto. Não aplicabilidade do princípio da insignificância aos portadores de maus antecedentes ou reincidentes em pequenos delitos. 2012. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Faculdade de Direito da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2012.
ROXIN, Claus. Derecho penal: parte general: fundamentos. La estructura de la teoría del delito. Trad. Diego-Manuel Luzón Peña, Miguel Díaz y García Conlledo, Javier de Vicente Remesal. Madrid: Civitas, 2008. t. 1.
SOUZA, Luciano Anderson. Direito Penal: Parte Geral. v. 1. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.
Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).