Challenges to the Public Prosecutor’s Office from the international protection of human rights

Views: 55

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13946967

Keywords:

conventionality control, jury tribunal, verdicts, dynamic security, police lethality

Abstract

Brazil owes obligations assumed at the international human rights level. The effectiveness of criminal prosecution and the challenges to its implementation are on the agenda of the Public Prosecutor's Office which, in order to achieve them, must incorporate a sense of conventionality in the areas of direct investigation, criminal prosecution of crimes against life and the promotion of penal policies. The article presents the demands imposed by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on the first two issues and by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime on the last. The article carries out a documentary review and analysis of the decisions and acts formalized in these three areas, to map out the challenges of implementing the obligations imposed on the Brazilian state and, in particular, on the Public Prosecutor's Office.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Antonio Henrique Graciano Suxberger, Centro Universitário de Brasília, CEUB, Brasil.

Doutor (Universidade Pablo de Olavide, Sevilha, Espanha, 2009), Mestre em Direito (Universidade de Brasília, 2005), Especialista (Ordem Jurídica e Ministério Público, Fundação Escola Superior do MPDFT, 2000/2001), Graduado em Direito (Universidade de Brasília, 1999). Pós-Doutor em Democracia e Direitos Humanos pelo Ius Gentium Conimbrigae (IGC) da Universidade de Coimbra (2018). Currículo Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/9136957784681802 

References

BRASIL. Conselho Nacional de Justiça. Regras Mínimas das Nações Unidas para o Tratamento de Reclusos (Regras de Nelson Mandela). Brasília: CNJ, 2016. (Série Tratados Internacionais de Direitos Humanos).

BRASIL. Conselho Nacional do Ministério Público. Proposição 1.00922/2023-01. Distribuição em 24 out. 2023a. Rel. Cons. Engels Augusto Muniz. Aguarda julgamento [5 jun. 2024].

BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. ADPF 347. Tribunal Pleno. Rel. Min. Luis Roberto Barroso. Julg. 4 out. 2023. DJe 19 dez. 2023b.

BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. ARE 1.225.185 RG. Tema 1.087. Pleno. Rel. Min. Gilmar Mendes. Julg. em 7/5/2020.

BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. RE 593.727 RG. Pleno. Rel. Min. Cezar Peluso; Rel. para o acórdão Min. Gilmar Mendes. Julg. 14 mai. 2015. DJ 8 set. 2015a.

BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Tema 184 de Repercussão Geral. Julg. 14 mai. 2015b.

ORGANIZAÇÃO DOS ESTADOS AMERICANOS. Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos. Caso Sales Pimenta vs. Brasil - Sentença de 30 de junho de 2022 (Exceções Preliminares, Mérito, Reparações e Custas). San José, Costa Rica: OEA, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_454_por.pdf. Acesso em: 5 jun. 2024.

ORGANIZAÇÃO DOS ESTADOS AMERICANOS. Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos. Caso V.R.P., V.P.C. y otros vs. Nicaragua - Sentencia de 8 de marzo de 2018 (Excepciones Preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas). San José, Costa Rica: OEA, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_350_esp.pdf. Acesso em: 5 jun. 2024.

UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME. Handbook on Dynamic Security and Prison Intelligence. Nova York: United Nations, 2015. (Criminal Justice Handbook Series).

Downloads

Published

2024-11-29

How to Cite

Suxberger, A. H. G. (2024). Challenges to the Public Prosecutor’s Office from the international protection of human rights. Boletim IBCCRIM, 32(385), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13946967

Issue

Vol. 32 No. 385 (2024): Boletim Especial: Desafios atuais do Ministério Público na persecução penal

Section

Dossiê: "Desafios atuais do Ministério Público na persecução penal"

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.

Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).