Criticism to suspension of effectiveness of the art. 3º-a of CPP

Views: 107

Authors

  • Bruno Augusto Vigo Milanez Universidade Federal do Paraná, UFPR, Brasil.

Keywords:

Anti-crimepackage, Adversarial system, Counter-reform

Abstract

The article intend to demonstrate that the injunction of Justice Luiz Fux, at the ADI’s 6.298, 6.299, 6.300 e 6.305, does not contain explicit fundamentals that would allow the suspension of the effectiveness of art. 3º-A, CPP. Besides violating the constitutional principle of motivation, the injuction is inserted in what could be called counter-reform movement, in which beneficial providences in favor of the adversary system are simply set aside, maintaining the inquisitorial mentality and practices in the Brazilian criminal procedure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
11%
33%
Days to publication 
6
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
Instituto Brasileiro de Ciências Criminais
Publisher 
IBCCRIM

Author Biography

Bruno Augusto Vigo Milanez, Universidade Federal do Paraná, UFPR, Brasil.

Doutor e Mestre em Direito pela UFPR. Especialista em Direito Penal e Criminologia – ICPC/UFPR. Professor e Advogado.

References

BETTIOL, Giuseppe. Instituições de direito e processo penal. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 1974.

BINDER, Alberto. El cambio de la justicia penal hacia el sistema adversarial. Significado e dificultades. In: CAMPOS, Santiago Pereira; POSTIGO, Leonel González; RÚA, Gonçalo (Coords.). Código del Proceso Penal: reflexiones sobre el nuevo sistema procesal penal en Uruguay. Montevideo: CEJA – JSCA, 2018, p. 11-31.

BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal (1. Turma). HC 137.888. Relator: Min. Rosa Weber, 21 fev. 2018. Disponível em: https://www.stf.jus.br/arquivo/djEletronico/DJE_20180220_031.pdf. Acesso em: 27 jun. 2021.

CHOUKR, Fauzi Hassan. As reformas pontuais do Código de Processo Penal. In: CHOUKR, Fauzi Hassan. (Coord.). Estudos do processo penal: o mundo à revelia. Campinas: Agá Juris, 2000, p. 101-115.

COUTINHO, Jacinto Nelson de Miranda. As reformas parciais do CPP e a gestão da prova: segue o princípio inquisitivo. Boletim do IBCCRIM, n. 188, p. 11-13, jul. 2008.

COUTINHO, Jacinto Nelson de Miranda. Sistema acusatório: cada parte no lugar constitucionalmente demarcado. Revista de Informação Legislativa, Brasília. a. 46, n. 183, p. 103-115, jul./set. 2009.

GOLDSCHIMDT, James. Princípios gerais do processo penal. Belo Horizonte: Líder, 2002.

LOPES JUNIOR, Aury. Direito processual penal. 13.ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2016.

PISAPIA, Gian Domenico. Compendio di procedura penale. 4.ed. Padova: Cedam, 1985.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-11

How to Cite

Vigo Milanez, B. A. (2024). Criticism to suspension of effectiveness of the art. 3º-a of CPP. Boletim IBCCRIM, 29(345), 9–11. Retrieved from https://publicacoes.ibccrim.org.br/index.php/boletim_1993/article/view/1338

Issue

Vol. 29 No. 345 (2021): Boletim IBCCRIM - Agosto

Section

Doutrina

License

Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.

Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).