Witnesses heard by letter of request and the (re)interpretation of art. 222, §1 of the code of criminal procedure

Views: 16

Authors

  • José de Assis Santiago Neto Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, PUC Minas, Brasil.

Keywords:

Due process of law, Contradictory, Testimonial evidence, Questioning

Abstract

The constitutional process model demands infraconstitutional rules to be interpreted in order to give maximum effectiveness to constitutional rules. Thus, § 1 of art. 222 of the CPP must be interpreted in conformity with the Constitution to ensure that the defendant is only questioned after all testimonial evidence has been produced.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

José de Assis Santiago Neto, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, PUC Minas, Brasil.

Doutor e Mestre em Direito Processual pela PUCMG. Professor Adjunto de Direito Penal e Processual Penal pela PUCMG. Advogado Criminalista.

References

ANDOLINA, Italo; VIGNERA GIUSEPPE. I fondamenti costituzionali della giustizia civile. 2. edição. Torino: G. Giappichelli Editore, 1997.

BARROS, Flaviane de Magalhães. (Re)Forma do Processo Penal. 2. ed. Belo Horizonte: Del Rey, 2009.

BRASIL, Código de Processo Penal.

BRASIL, Superior Tribunal de Justiça, HC 585.942/MT, rel. Min. Sebastião Reis Júnior.

BRASIL, Supremo Tribunal Federal, AgR na AP 528, rel. Min. Edson Fachin.

BRASIL, Supremo Tribunal Federal, HC 127.900/AM, rel. Min. Dias Toffoli.

CORDERO, Franco. Guida alla procedura penale. Torino: UTET, 1986.

CORDERO, Franco. Procedimiento penal. Santa Fé de Bogotá: Temis, 2000.

SANTIAGO NETO, José de Assis. Estado Democrático de Direito e Processo Penal Acusatório: a participação dos sujeitos no centro do palco processual. 3. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-11

How to Cite

de Assis Santiago Neto, J. (2024). Witnesses heard by letter of request and the (re)interpretation of art. 222, §1 of the code of criminal procedure. Boletim IBCCRIM, 29(346), 17–18. Retrieved from https://publicacoes.ibccrim.org.br/index.php/boletim_1993/article/view/1361

Issue

Vol. 29 No. 346 (2021): Boletim IBCCRIM - Setembro

Section

Doutrina

License

Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.

Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).