Judicial control in cases of refusal of the public ministry to offering the proposal of non-criminal prosecution agreement

Views: 11

Authors

  • Stephanie Carolyn Perez Universidad de Buenos Aires, UBA, Argentina.
  • Ulisses Augusto Pascolati Junior Universidade de São Paulo, USP, Brasil.

Keywords:

Non-criminal prosecution agreement, Lack of interest, Rejection of the complaint, 30 years of ECA, External control

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to shed some light on the position of the Public Prosecutor regarding the non-criminal prosecution agreement as an instrument of criminal policy for discretionary assessment. In this sense, the central point, taking into account the content of Statements 21 of the Public Prosecutor's Office of São Paulo and 19 of the National Group of Criminal Division Coordinators, is thinking in a mechanism for external control of the Public Prosecutor's role in the case of the investigated, even meeting the requirements required by law, and therefore having the right to that institute, having denied the right to conclude the agreement under the ministerial argument of not being necessary and sufficient to reprobation and crime prevention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Stephanie Carolyn Perez, Universidad de Buenos Aires, UBA, Argentina.

Doutoranda em Direito Penal pela Universidade de Buenos Aires. Professora de Direito Penal e Processo Penal. Advogada criminalista.

Ulisses Augusto Pascolati Junior, Universidade de São Paulo, USP, Brasil.

Doutor em Direito Penal pela USP. Professor de Direito Penal. Juiz de Direito do TJSP.

References

BECHARA, Ana Elisa Liberatore S. Direitos humanos e direito penal: limites da intervenção penal racional no Estado Democrático de Direito. In: MENDES, Gilmar Ferreira, BOTTINI, Pierpaolo Cruz, PACELLI, Eugênio (coord). Direito penal contemporâneo. Questões controvertidas. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2011.

JESCHECK, Hans-Heinrich; WEIGEND, Thomas. Tratado de derecho penal. Trad. Miguel Olmedo Cardenete. Granada: Comares S.L, 2002

LOPES JR., Aury. Direito Processual Penal. 17. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2020.

LOPES JR., Aury. (Re)pensando as condições da ação processual penal desde as categorias jurídicas próprias do processo penal. In: FAYET JÚNIOR, Ney; MAYA, André Machado (org.). Ciências penais e sociedade complexa I. Porto Alegre: Nuria Fabris, 2008.

MUÑOZ CONDE, Francisco. Introducción al derecho penal. 2. ed. Buenos Aires: IBdef, 2001.

SÁNCHEZ-OSTIZ, Pablo. Fundamentos de política criminal. Un retorno a los principios. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2012.

SILVA SÁNCHEZ, Jesús-María. Tiempos de Derecho Penal. Buenos Aires: IBdef, 2009.

SILVEIRA, Marco Aurélio Nunes da. A ação processual penal entre política e constituição: outra teoria para o direito processual penal. Tese (Doutorado em Direito) - Setor de Ciências Jurídicas, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, 20121.

ZIPF, Heinz. Introducción a la política criminal. Santiago: Ediciones Olejnik, 2018.

LEI Nº 13.964, DE 24 DE DEZEMBRO DE 2019. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2019-2022/2019/lei/L13964.htm

Downloads

Published

2024-07-16

How to Cite

Perez, S. C., & Pascolati Junior, U. A. (2024). Judicial control in cases of refusal of the public ministry to offering the proposal of non-criminal prosecution agreement. Boletim IBCCRIM, 29(348), 7–9. Retrieved from https://publicacoes.ibccrim.org.br/index.php/boletim_1993/article/view/1384

Issue

Vol. 29 No. 348 (2021): Boletim IBCCRIM - Novembro

Section

Doutrina

License

Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.

Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).

Metrics