"When [is] necessary" the access to the evidence by the defence? Article 3-b, XV, of penal procedure code in light of the leading cases of binding precedent 14

Views: 14

Authors

  • Henrique de Sá Valadão Lopes Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)

Keywords:

Binding precedent 14, Leading cases, Confidential investigation, Inaccessibility to the defense, Exceptions

Abstract

The purpose of this text is to analyse the judgments that were the basis for the edition of the binding precedent no. 14 in order to better understand the legislative changes that have occurred since 2009 regarding the confidential nature of the investigation and the right of access of the investigated to it. Based on this analysis it was possible to realize that the access by the investigated to the records of the secret investigation is an exception, being limited to the hypotheses in which the investigated is already arrested or that, having been indicted, is in the imminence of being questioned in police headquarters.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Henrique de Sá Valadão Lopes, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)

Pós-Graduado pela Escola Superior do Ministério Público da União. Bacharel em Direito pela UFF.  Procurador da República. 

References

BRASIL. Código de Processo Penal. Decreto-Lei n° 3.689, de 3 de outubro de 1941. Disponível em: https://tinyurl.com/y2rxk2w4. Acesso em 24/02/2022.

BRASIL. Lei n° 8.906, de 4 de julho de 1994. Disponível em: https://tinyurl.com/mr56ajet. Acesso em 24/02/2022.

BRASIL. Lei n° 11.417, de 19 de dezembro de 2006. Disponível em: https://tinyurl.com/4smuhnm7. Acesso em 24/02/2022.

BRASIL. Lei n° 12.527, de 18 de novembro de 2011. Disponível em: https://tinyurl.com/yrxf8u4u. Acesso em 24/02/2022.

BRASIL. Lei n° 13.964, de 24 de dezembro de 2019. Disponível em: https://tinyurl.com/4zpnddy2. Acesso em 24/02/2022.

BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal (1ª Turma). HC 82354, Relator Ministro Sepúlveda Pertence, 24/09/2004. Disponível em: https://tinyurl.com/yc7tv47f. Acesso em 24/02/2022.

BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal (1ª Turma). HC 87827, Relator Ministro Sepúlveda Pertence, 23/06/2006. Disponível em: https://tinyurl.com/2ztxch95. Acesso em 24/02/2022.

BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal (2ª Turma). HC 88190, Relator Ministro Cesar Peluso, 06/06/2006. Disponível em: https://tinyurl.com/4vcfru7s. Acesso em 24/02/2022.

BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal (Pleno). HC 88520, Relator p/ Acordão Ministro Marco Aurélio, 19/12/2007. Disponível em: https://tinyurl.com/49d9upra. Acesso em 24/02/2022.

BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal (1ª Turma). HC 90232, Relator Ministro Sepúlveda Pertence, 02/03/2007. Disponível em: https://tinyurl.com/yub54yvz. Acesso em 24/02/2022.

BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal (1ª Turma). HC 92331, Relator Ministro Marco Aurélio, 01/08/2008. Disponível em: https://tinyurl.com/nvyv27fd. Acesso em 24/02/2022.

BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal (1ª Turma). HC 91684, Relator Ministro Marco Aurélio, 17/04/2009. Disponível em: https://tinyurl.com/3w4s2u3w. Acesso em 24/02/2022.

BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal (Pleno). PSV 1, Relator Ministro Menezes Direito, 23/07/2009. Disponível em: https://tinyurl.com/wfumnhy5. Acesso em 24/02/2022.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-22

How to Cite

de Sá Valadão Lopes, H. (2024). "When [is] necessary" the access to the evidence by the defence? Article 3-b, XV, of penal procedure code in light of the leading cases of binding precedent 14 . Boletim IBCCRIM, 30(352), 28–31. Retrieved from https://publicacoes.ibccrim.org.br/index.php/boletim_1993/article/view/1449

Issue

Vol. 30 No. 352 (2022): Boletim IBCCRIM - Março

Section

Diálogos

License

Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.

Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).