The chain of custody of digital evidence in criminal procedure: brief notes on the logic of suspicion, informational asymmetry and the right of defense
Views: 1351Keywords:
Criminal evidence, Chain of custody, Informational asymmetry, Right of defenseAbstract
Commenting on the importance of the chain of custody of digital evidence, based on the logic of suspicion, the text intends to underline, in general terms, some difficulties related to informational asymmetry in criminal procedure and the problems that it entails for the exercise of the right of defense.
Downloads
References
ANDERSON, Terence; SCHUM, David; TWINING, William. Análisis de la prueba. Trad. coord. Flavia Carbonell e Claudio Agüero. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2015.
BADARÓ, Gustavo. A cadeia de custódia da prova digital. In: SARLET, Ingo W. et al. (org.). Direito probatório. Londrina: Thoth, 2023. p. 175-188.
BADARÓ, Gustavo. Direito à prova e os limites lógicos de sua admissão: os conceitos de pertinência e relevância. In: BEDAQUE, José Roberto dos S. et al. (coord.). Garantismo processual: garantias constitucionais aplicadas ao processo. Brasília: Gazeta Jurídica, 2016. p. 219-260.
BATISTA, Nilo. Decisões criminais comentadas. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Liber Juris, 1984.
BAYTELMAN A., Andrés; DUCE J., Mauricio. Litigación penal: juicio oral y prueba. México: FCE, 2005.
BIDINO, Claudio; TÓRTIMA, Fernanda. A doutrina Brady e o dever de o MP revelar ao réu a existência de provas essenciais. Revista Consultor Jurídico, 11 ago. 2020.
DYBDAHL, Thomas L. When innocence is not enough: hidden evidence and the failed promise of the Brady Rule. New York: The New Press, 2023.
FERRAJOLI, Luigi. Derecho y razón: teoría del garantismo penal. Trad. Perfecto Andrés Ibáñez e outros. 10. ed., 3. reimp. Madrid: Trotta, 2018.
FLORIDI, Luciano. Artificial intelligence, deepfakes and a future of ectypes. Philosophy and Technology, v. 31, n. 3, p. 317-321, 2018.
LIDÉN, Moa; GRÄNS, Minna; JUSLIN, Peter. From devil’s advocate to crime fighter: confirmation bias and debiasing techniques in prosecutorial decision-making. Psychology, Crime & Law, v. 25, n. 5, p. 494-526, 2019.
NATIONAL REGISTRY OF EXONERATIONS. Government misconduct and convicting the innocent: the role of prosecutors, police and other law enforcement, 1 set. 2020.
PRADO, Geraldo. A cadeia de custódia da prova no processo penal. 2. ed. São Paulo: Marcial Pons, 2021.
VITAL, Danilo. Abusos intoleráveis: país deve reavaliar custo de condenações com lastro em abuso de direitos. Revista Consultor Jurídico, 9 maio 2021.
WEXLER, Rebecca. Assimetrias de privacidade. In: CRUZ, Francisco B.; SIMÃO, Bárbara (ed.). Direitos fundamentais e processo penal na era digital. v. 5. São Paulo: Internetlab, 2021. p. 17-33.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.
Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).
Português (Brasil)
English
Español (España)
