Constitutional Complaint 44565 – letter rogatory or mutual legal assistance request: what to decide about?

Views: 700

Authors

Keywords:

Criminal procedure, International legal cooperation, Due process of law, Letter rogatory, Mutual legal assistance

Abstract

This article aims to address issues involving the differences between letter rogatory and mutual legal assistance requests, in the light of the decision of the STJ issued in Constitutional Complaint 44565. The current existing criteria in the Brazilian legal system do not allow identifying clear distinctive elements between the two institutes, which leads to an overlap of enforcement and uncertainty. To better understand the theme, a brief history of the institutes and the jurisprudential changes that resulted in the current confusion between them is made.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Dra. Carolina Yumi de Souza, Universidade de São Paulo - USP - São Paulo/SP

Doutora e Mestra em Direito Processual Penal pela USP. Advogada da União. Diretora do Departamento de Recuperação de Ativos e Cooperação Jurídica Internacional do Ministério da Justiça e Segurança Pública. Lattes CV: http://lattes.cnpq.br/4514809908064482

References

ABADE, Denise Neves. Convivência entre instrumentos cooperacionais: a carta rogatória e o auxílio direto. In: PAGLIARINI, Alexandre Coutinho; CHOUKR, Fauzi Hassan (coord.). Cooperação Jurídica Internacional. Belo Horizonte: Fórum, 2014. p. 307-329.

BRIGGS, Arthur. Cartas rogatórias internacionais. Rio de Janeiro: Imprensa Nacional, 1913.

GRÜTZNER, Heinrich. International judicial assistance and cooperation in criminal matters. In: BASSIOUNI, M. Cherif; NANDA, Ved P. A Tratise on International Criminal Law. v. II – Jurisdiction and Cooperation. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, 1973.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-13

How to Cite

Yumi de Souza, D. C. (2023). Constitutional Complaint 44565 – letter rogatory or mutual legal assistance request: what to decide about?. Boletim IBCCRIM, 31(367). Retrieved from https://publicacoes.ibccrim.org.br/index.php/boletim_1993/article/view/537

Issue

Vol. 31 No. 367 (2023): Boletim IBCCRIM - Junho

Section

Jurisprudência Comentada

License

Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.

Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).