Non-prosecution agreement: a new beginning of era (?)

Views: 82

Authors

Keywords:

Consensual Justice, Non-Prosecution Agreement, Law 13.964/19

Abstract

The article analyzes the hierarchical and bureaucratic apparatus of the Roman-Germanic justice system and the Anglo-Saxon horizontal and parity structure. It seeks to understand the rationality of decision-making processes in each model and verifies if when implementing consensual justice, Brazil has adopted a legal culture that is less dependent on the official pronouncement of the State. This evaluation allowed knowledge of the conditions under which we will receive the non-persecution agreement, as well as to promote a more critical reading of the new legislation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Prof. Dr. Leonardo Augusto Marinho Marques, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG - Belo Horizonte/MG

Doutor em Ciências Penais pela UFMG. Professor de Processo Penal de UFMG. Advogado. Link Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/5388381867392010

 

 

References

DAMASKA, Mirjan R. Las caras de la justicia y el poder del Estado: análisis comparada del proceso legal. Santiago: Editorial Juridica de Chile, 2000.

DELMAS-MARTY, Meirelle. Processos Penais da Europa. Trad. Fauzi Hassan Choukr. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2006.

RAMOS, João Gualberto Garcez. Curso de Processo Penal norte-americano. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2006.

THAMAN, Stephen C. Aspectos adversariales, acusatorios e inquisitivos en el Proceso Penal de los Estados Unidos. In: WINTER, Lorena Bachmaier (Coord.). Proceso penal y sistemas acusatórios. Marcial Pons: Madrid, 2008.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-02

How to Cite

Augusto Marinho Marques, P. D. L. (2020). Non-prosecution agreement: a new beginning of era (?). Boletim IBCCRIM, 28(331), 9–12. Retrieved from https://publicacoes.ibccrim.org.br/index.php/boletim_1993/article/view/552

Issue

Vol. 28 No. 331 (2020): Boletim especial: Lei Anticrime (Parte 2)

Section

Doutrina

License

Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.

Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).