Does the President of the Republic, in the context of the pandemic, commit Crime against Humanity?

Views: 28

Authors

  • Dr. Carlos Eduardo Adriano Japiassú Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ - Rio de Janeiro/RJ

Keywords:

Coronavirus, Crime against humanity, International Criminal Court

Abstract

This article seeks to clarify whether the attitudes of the current President of the Republic of Brazil towards the pandemic caused by the new coronavirus, contrary to the isolation measures recommended by health authorities, can be classified as a crime against humanity, under the terms of the Statute of the International Criminal Court, through an exegetical, jurisprudential and doctrinal analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Dr. Carlos Eduardo Adriano Japiassú, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ - Rio de Janeiro/RJ

Professor Titular de Direito Penal da UERJ, Professor Associado IV de Direito Penal da UFRJ, Coordenador do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito da Universidade Estácio de Sá e Vice-Presidente da Associação Internacional de Direito Penal. Lattes CV: http://lattes.cnpq.br/4350542582787639

References

AMBOS, Kai. Treatise on international criminal law: foundations and general part. Oxford: Oxford University Press, v. 1, 2013, p. 241.

DIXON, Rodney. Article 7, Part 2 – Jurisdiction, admissibility and applicable law. TRIFFTERER, Otto (org.). Commentary on the Rome statute of international criminal court: observer’s note, article by article. 2. ed., Munique: Beck, Hart: Oxford, 2008, p. 181.

LIROLA DELGADO, Isabel; MARTÍN MARTÍNEZ, Magdalena M. La Corte Penal Internacional  Justicia versus Impunidad. Barcelona: Ariel, 2001, p. 121/122.

Opinion and Judgement, Prosecutor vs. Tadic, Case Nº IT-94-1-T, T. Ch. II, 7 may 1997, p. 232/255.

UNITED NATION. Prosecutor vs. Blaskic. Julgamento de 3 de março de 2000, parágrafo 77. Disponível em: <http://www.icty.org/x/cases/blaskic/tjug/en/bla-tj000303e.pdf>. Acesso em: 6 de abril. de 2020.

UNITED NATION. Prosecutor vs. Blaskic. Julgamento de 3 de março de 2000, parágrafo 254. Disponível em: <http://www.icty.org/x/cases/blaskic/tjug/en/bla-tj000303e.pdf>. Acesso em: 6 abr. 2020.

UNITED NATION. Prosecutor vs. Kunarac, Julgamento de 22 de fevereiro de 2001, parágrafo 423. Disponível em: https://www.icty.org/x/cases/kunarac/tjug/en/kun-tj010222e.pdf. Acesso em: 6 abr. 2020.

UNITED NATION. Prosecutor vs. Kunarac. Julgamento de 12 de junho de 2002, parágrafo 102. Disponível em: <https://www.icty.org/x/cases/kunarac/acjug/en/kun-aj020612e.pdf>http://www.icty.org/x/cases/kunarac/acjug/en/kun-aj020612e.pdf. Acesso em: 6 de abr.il de 2020.

UNITED NATION. Prosecutor vs. Tadic. Julgamento de 15 de julho de 1999, parágrafo 271. Disponível em: <https://www.icty.org/x/cases/tadic/acjug/en/tad-aj990715e.pdf>. Acesso em: 6 abr. 2020.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-04

How to Cite

Japiassú, D. C. E. A. (2023). Does the President of the Republic, in the context of the pandemic, commit Crime against Humanity?. Boletim IBCCRIM, 28(332), 4–7. Retrieved from https://publicacoes.ibccrim.org.br/index.php/boletim_1993/article/view/819

Issue

Vol. 28 No. 332 (2020): Boletim IBCCRIM - Julho

Section

Doutrina

License

Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.

Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).