The restriction of downgrading imprisonment in the “anticrime bill” and the incapacitation logic: a brief discussion

Views: 37

Authors

  • Luiz Henrique Carvalheiro Rossetto Universidade de São Paulo - USP - São Paulo/SP

Keywords:

Criminal Law, Theories of Punishment, Incapacitation, Prison Downgrading, Legality

Abstract

The present article aims to discuss the criminal policy behind the so-called “anti-crime bill”, its proposal to harshen the present rules for downgrading imprisonment and its relation with the idea of a specific deterrence through incapacitation. Furthermore, it is argued that this logic tends to weaken the principle of legality in criminal law. Finally, the paper still indicates a possible conflict between the new law and the Brazilian Supreme Court precedents.   

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Luiz Henrique Carvalheiro Rossetto, Universidade de São Paulo - USP - São Paulo/SP

Possui graduação em Direito pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (2011) e mestrado em Direito pela Universidade de São Paulo. Lattes CV: http://lattes.cnpq.br/6103228131571727.

References

AMBOS, Kai, ¿De Vuelta Al Derecho Penal De Autor Del Nacionalsocialismo? Enfoques Penales, Buenos Aires, mar. 2019. Disponível em: <http://crimint.com.ar/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/ Enfoques-Penales-%C2%BFDe-vuelta-al-Derecho-penal-de-autor-Ambos.pdf>. Acesso em: 08 mar. 2020.

FRISCH, Wolfgang. Das Marburger Programm und die Maßregeln der Besserung und Sicherung. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, número 94, volume 3, 1982.

FROMMEL, Monika. Was bedeutet uns heute noch Franz von Liszt?. Journal der Juristischen Zeitgeschichte, número 14, vol. 1, 2013.

HEINRICH, Bernd. Die Grenzen des Strafrechts bei der Gefahrprävention. Brauchen oder haben wir ein „Feindstrafrecht “?. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, número 121, vol. 1, 2009.

JAKOBS, Günther. Terroristen als Personen im Recht? . Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, número 117, vol. 4, 2004.

LISZT, Franz von. Der Zweckgedanke im Strafrecht. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, número 3, volume 1, 1883.

MORO, Sérgio Fernando. O projeto de lei anticrime. Folha de S. Paulo. 17 mar. 2019. Disponível em: <https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/opiniao/2019/03/o-projeto-de-lei-anticrime.shtml>.

MÜLLER-DIETZ, Heinz. Das Marburger Programm aus der Sicht des Strafvollzugs. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, número 94, volume 3, 1982.

NAUCKE, Wolfgang. La progresiva pérdida de contenido del principio de legalidad penal como consecuencia de un positivismo relativista y politizado. In: La insostenible situación del derecho penal. Granada: Comares, 2000. (Estudios de derecho penal, 15).

PAWLIK, Michael. Das Unrecht des Bürgers. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012.

POSNER, Richard A. A problemática da Teoria Moral e Jurídica. São Paulo: Editora WMF Martins Fontes, 2012.

ROBINSON, Paul. H. Punishing dangerousness: cloaking preventive detention as criminal justice. Harvard Law Review, nº 5, 03/2001.

ROXIN, Claus. Strafrecht I. München: C.H. Beck, 2006.

SILVA SÁNCHEZ, Jesus-María. A Expansão do Direito Penal. São Paulo: RT, 2011.

VORMBAUM, Thomas. Einführung in die moderne Strafrechtsgescichte, p. 147. Heidelberg: Springer, 2010.

WETZELL, Richard F. Franz v. Liszt und die internationale Strafrechtsreformbewegung. In KOCH, Arnd; LÖHNIG, Martin (orgs.). Die Schule Franz vol Liszts. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016.

ZIMRING, Franklin E.; HAWKINS, Gordon. Incapacitation: Penal Confinement and the Restraint of Crime. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995

Downloads

Published

2023-12-05

How to Cite

Carvalheiro Rossetto, L. H. (2023). The restriction of downgrading imprisonment in the “anticrime bill” and the incapacitation logic: a brief discussion. Boletim IBCCRIM, 28(333), 22–24. Retrieved from https://publicacoes.ibccrim.org.br/index.php/boletim_1993/article/view/868

Issue

Vol. 28 No. 333 (2020): Boletim IBCCRIM - Agosto

Section

Doutrina

License

Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.

Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).