The (in)constitutionality and the (un)conventionality of pretrial detention only in the basis of recidivism
Views: 42Keywords:
Recidivism, Pretrial detention, “Anti-crime Law”Abstract
This article aims to analyze the (in)constitutionality of article 310, §2 of the Brazilian Code of Criminal Procedure, regarding specifically the recidivism as the only basis for the issue or maintenance of pretrial detention. Drawing on the analysis of the Brazilian Constitution, the doctrine and the jurisprudence of the Supreme Federal Court, the conclusion is that the referred pretrial detention is unconstitutional, as it violates, among other constitutional principles, the presumption of innocence. Furthermore, based on the analysis of the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, the conclusion is that the aforementioned pretrial detention is also unconventional, as it denotes a rescue of the “Criminal law of the author”.
Downloads
References
BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade nº 3112, Relator Ministro Ricardo Lewandowski, Tribunal Pleno, julgado em 02/05/2007. Brasília: DJU, 26/10/2007.
BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Habeas Corpus nº 104339, Relator Ministro Gilmar Mendes, Tribunal Pleno, julgado em 10/05/2012. Brasília: DJU, 6/12/2012.
BRITO, Alexis Couto de; FABRETTI, Humberto Barrionuevo; LIMA; Marco Antônio Ferreira. Processo Penal Brasileiro. 4. ed. E-book. São Paulo: Atlas, 2019.
COSTA RICA. Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos. Caso Fermín Ramírez vs. Guatemala. Sentença de 20 de junho de 2005 (Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas).
FERRAJOLI, Luigi. Direito e razão: teoria do garantismo penal. 4. ed. São Paulo: Thomson Reuters Revista dos Tribunais, 2014.
FILIPPO, Thiago Baldani Gomes de. Lei Anticrime e reincidência: um flerte com o direito penal do autor. Boletim IBCCRIM. São Paulo, ano 28, n. 330, p. 20-22, mai. 2020.
LIMA, Renato Brasileiro de. Manual de Processo Penal. 8. ed. Salvador: JusPodivm, 2020.
LOPES JR, Aury. Direito Processual Penal. 11. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2014.
LOPES JR, Aury. Direito Processual Penal. 16. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2019.
LOPES JR, Aury. Prisões cautelares. 5. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2017.
NUCCI, Guilherme de Souza. Prisão e Liberdade: As reformas processuais penais introduzidas pela Lei 12.403, de 4 de maio de 2011. São Paulo: Revistas dos Tribunais, 2011.
PAIVA, Caio; HEEMANN, Thimotie Aragon. Jurisprudência Internacional de Direitos Humanos. 2. ed. São Paulo: CEI, 2017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.
Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).