The risks of a hasty use of spyware in criminal prosecution
Views: 128Keywords:
ADPF nº 1.143, spyware, criminal prosecutionAbstract
In December 2023, the Office of the Prosecutor General filed ADO No. 84 in the Supreme Federal Court, which was later converted into ADPF No. 1,143, alleging a partial omission by the National Congress in ensuring the constitutional rights to privacy, private life, and confidentiality of communications (Art. 5, X and XII). The situation is as concerning as it is paradoxical: the institution responsible for safeguarding fundamental rights proposes to restrict these rights under the pretext of protecting them.
Downloads
Publication Facts
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
- Editor & editorial board
- profiles
- Academic society
- Instituto Brasileiro de Ciências Criminais
- Publisher
- IBCCRIM
To learn about these publication facts, click 
PF is maintained by the Public Knowledge Project
References
ADPF nº 1.143
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.
Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).
Português (Brasil)
English
Español (España)
