The new decision-making model in the criminal procedure after the law nº 13.964/2019

Views: 16

Authors

  • Luis Henrique Pichini Santos Fundação Getúlio Vargas
  • Marco Antônio Riechelmann Júnior Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito, Departamento de Direito Processual.

Keywords:

Rationale for decisions, Contradictory, Nullities, Law 13.964/2019

Abstract

This paper seeks to demonstrate that the inclusion of the hypothesis provided on art. 315, §2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has the function of complementing constitutional imperative. Despite the fact that legislative innovation was included in the chapter on preventive detention, it must be observed in all stages of its process, including the investigation phase, in order to make it possible to exercise other fundamental procedural guarantees. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Luis Henrique Pichini Santos, Fundação Getúlio Vargas

Pós-graduado em Direito Penal Econômico pela Faculdade Getúlio Vargas e em Direito Penal e Criminologia pelo Instituto de Criminologia e Política Criminal – ICPC. Advogado. 

Marco Antônio Riechelmann Júnior, Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito, Departamento de Direito Processual.

Mestrando em Teoria do Estado pela USP. Advogado. 

Downloads

Published

2024-07-16

How to Cite

Pichini Santos, L. H., & Riechelmann Júnior, M. A. (2024). The new decision-making model in the criminal procedure after the law nº 13.964/2019 . Boletim IBCCRIM, 29(348), 19–20. Retrieved from https://publicacoes.ibccrim.org.br/index.php/boletim_1993/article/view/1389

Issue

Vol. 29 No. 348 (2021): Boletim IBCCRIM - Novembro

Section

Doutrina

License

Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.

Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).

Most read articles by the same author(s)