The cognitive theory of the dolus and the enlargement of the punitive power
Views: 100Keywords:
Dolus, Purpose, Subjective imputationAbstract
As the cognitive theory of the dolus appeared, the discussion about demanding purpose to affirm the dolus was reborn. The present article, from a perspective that denies the legitimacy of the punitive power, intends to analyse this theory. For that, it begins questioning the punitive harshness in this theory and establishes the hypothesis that supressing the intent of the dolus analysis is an irrational increase in the criminal punishment.
Downloads
References
GRECO, Luís. Dolo sem vontade. In: D’ALMEIDA, Luís Duarte; DIAS, Augusto Silva; MENDES, Paulo de Sousa; ALVES, João Lopes; RAPOSO, João António (Orgs.). Líber amicorum de José de Sousa Brito em comemoração do 70º aniversário: estudos de direito e filosofia. Coimbra: Almedina, 2009.
HUNGRIA, Nélson. Comentários ao Código Penal. v. I, tomo II. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 1958.
PUPPE, Ingeborg. Dolo eventual e culpa consciente. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Criminais, São Paulo, v. 14, n. 58, p. 114-132, jan./fev. 2006.
SANTOS, Humberto Souza. Problemas estruturais do conceito volitivo de dolo. In: GRECO, Luís; LOBATO, José Danilo Tavares (Orgs.). Temas de Direito Penal, Parte Geral. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2008.
TAVARES, Juarez. Fundamentos de teoria do delito. São Paulo: Tirant lo Blanch, 2020.
VIANA, Eduardo. Dolo como compromisso cognitivo. São Paulo: Marcial Pons, 2017.
ZAFFARONI, Eugenio Raúl; BATISTA, Nilo; ALAGIA, Alejandro; SLOKAR, Alejandro. Direito penal brasileiro. v. II, tomo I. Teoria do delito: introdução histórica e metodológica, ação e tipicidade. Rio de Janeiro: Revan, 2010.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.
Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).