Abolishing the exclusionary rule

comparatism and deconstitutionalization of exclusionary rule

Views: 35

Authors

  • Ricardo Jacobsen Gloeckner Universidade Federal do Paraná, UFPR, Brasil.

Keywords:

Criminal Procedure, Exclusionary Rule, Comparative Law

Abstract

The article intends to show how comparativism as a methodological tool and the ultimate deconstitutionalization turn of exclusionary rules produced by U.S Supreme  Court are used in a certainly wrong way in criminal procedure. The misuse of comparative law as an epistemologic index has contributed to increase breaches in criminal procedure guarantees, mainly the exclusionary rule protection. The importation of “inclusionary rules” means a disguised operation into the abolition of these kind of evidence rules. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ricardo Jacobsen Gloeckner, Universidade Federal do Paraná, UFPR, Brasil.

Pós-Doutor pela Universidade Federico II; Doutor em Direito pela UFPR; Mestre em Ciências Criminais pela PUC-RS. Professor do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Criminais da PUC-RS. Coordenador da Especialização em Ciências Penais da PUC-RS. Advogado.

References

AGUILERA MORALES, Marien. Regla de exclusión y acusatorio. In: BACHMAIER WINTER, Lorena (coord.). Proceso penal y sistemas acusatorios. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2008.

ALSCHULER, Albert. Studying the exclusionary rule: an empirical classic. In The University of Chicago Law Review, v. 75, n. 4, 2008.

AMBOS, Kai. Las prohibiciones de utilización de pruebas en el proceso penal alemán. In: BELING, Ernst von; AMBOS, Kai; GUERRERO, Óscar Julián. Las prohibiciones probatorias. Bogotá: Temis, 2009.

BELING, Ernst von. Las prohibiciones de prueba como límite a la averiguación de la verdad en el proceso penal. In: BELING, Ernst von; AMBOS, Kai; GUERRERO, Óscar Julián. Las prohibiciones probatorias. Bogotá: Temis, 2009.

DAVIES, Sharon L; SCANLON, Anna B. Katz in the age of Hudson v. Michigan: some thoughts on “Suppression as last resort”. University of California Davis Law Review, v. 41, 2008.

DAVIES, Thomas Y. A hard look at what we know (and still need to learn) about the “costs” of the exclusionary rule: the NIJ study and other studies of “lost” arrests. American Bar Foundation Research, v. 611, n. 660, 1983.

EUSAMIO MAZAGATOS, Ester; SÁNCHEZ RUBIO, Ana. La prueba ilícita en la doctrina de la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch, 2016.

FALCÃO JÚNIOR, Alfredo Carlos Gonzaga. O justo título da relativização da prova ilícita: metodologia de aplicação da regra de calibragem do sistema jurídico. Tese (Doutorado em Direito) – Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, 2021.

GIANNOULPOULOS, Dimitrios. The exclusion of improperly obtained evidence in Greece: putting constitutional rights first. In The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, n. 11, 2007.

LANGER, Maximo. Revolução no processo penal latino-americano: difusão de ideias jurídicas a partir da periferia. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFRGS, n. 37, 2017.

MIRANDA ESTRAMPES, Manuel. Prueba ilícita y regla de exclusión en el sistema estadounidense: crónica de una muerte anunciada. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2019.

NARDULLI, Peter F. The societal costs of the exclusionary rule revisited. University of Illinois Law Review, n. 2, 1987.

RODRÍGUEZ-GARAVITO, César. Toward a sociology of the global rule of law field: neoliberalism, neconstitutionalism, and the contest over judicial reform in Latin America. In: DEZALAY, Yves; GARTH, Bryant G. Lawyers and the rule of law in an era of globalization. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.

SCOTT, Robert E.; STUNTZ, William J. Plea-bargaining as contract. Yale Law Journal, v. 101, 1992.

SENTÍS MELENDO, Santiago. La prueba. Buenos Aires: EJEA, 1979.

TURNER, Jenia Iontcheva; WEIGEND, Thomas. The purposes and functions of exclusionary rules: a comparative overview. In: GLESS, Sabine; RICHTER, Thomas. Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial? A comparative perspective on evidentiary rules. Cham: Springer, 2019.

TWINING, William. Rethinking evidence: exploratory essays. 2. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

TWINING, William L; TWINING, P. E. Bentham on torture. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, v. 24, n. 3, 1973.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-24

How to Cite

Jacobsen Gloeckner, R. (2024). Abolishing the exclusionary rule: comparatism and deconstitutionalization of exclusionary rule. Boletim IBCCRIM, 30(357), 28–30. Retrieved from https://publicacoes.ibccrim.org.br/index.php/boletim_1993/article/view/1509

Issue

Vol. 30 No. 357 (2022): Boletim IBCCRIM - Agosto

Section

Diálogos

License

Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.

Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).