The guarantee of the natural judge and the unconstitutionality of the super jurisdiction of the court of Curitiba in Lava Jato

Views: 36

Authors

  • Bruno Tadeu Buonicore Universidade de Frankfurt
  • Gilmar Mendes Supremo Tribunal Federal

Keywords:

Lava Jato, Supercompetence, Unconstitutionality, Natural Judge

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the unconstitutionality of the supercompetence of the 13th Federal Court of Curitiba to process and judge cases related to the anti-corruption crusade known as Lava Jato. The text seeks to bring both the doctrinal foundations linked to the natural judge guarantee under the rule of law and the evolution of the Brazilian Supreme Court’s precedents with a view to setting limits on the jurisdiction of the court of Curitiba.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Bruno Tadeu Buonicore, Universidade de Frankfurt

Assessor de Ministro do Supremo Tribunal Federal. Doutor em Direito (Direito Penal) – summa cum laude – pela Universidade de Frankfurt. Professor Titular (graduação, mestrado e doutorado) do Centro Universitário de Brasília.

Gilmar Mendes, Supremo Tribunal Federal

Ministro do Supremo Tribunal Federal. Doutor em Direito pela Universidade de Münster. Professor do Instituto Brasiliense de Direito Público – IDP.

References

DIAS, Jorge de Figueiredo. Direito processual penal. Coimbra: Ed. Coimbra, 1974.

RODRIGUES, Fabiana Alves. Lava Jato: aprendizado institucional e ação estratégica na Justiça. 2020.

VILLASCH, Pietro. Il principio del giudice naturale precostituito nella giurisdizione contabile. Rivista del Gruppo di Pisa, n. 1, p. 1-7, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-11

How to Cite

Buonicore, B. T., & Mendes, G. (2024). The guarantee of the natural judge and the unconstitutionality of the super jurisdiction of the court of Curitiba in Lava Jato. Boletim IBCCRIM, 29(346), 4–5. Retrieved from https://publicacoes.ibccrim.org.br/index.php/boletim_1993/article/view/1353

Issue

Vol. 29 No. 346 (2021): Boletim IBCCRIM - Setembro

Section

Doutrina

License

Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.

Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).