A (re)reading of the deadline for offering the complaint from the preventive detention in custody hearing

Views: 571

Authors

Keywords:

Criminal proceedings, Procedural term, Preventive Prison, Custody hearing

Abstract

This article is relevant in the national context, since it focuses on the study of a re-reading of article 46 of the CPP, in view of the theoretical common sense that still prevails in counting the procedural deadline for offering the complaint, especially when there is the preventive detention decreed during a custody hearing. The research problem is: to what extent did the beginning of the period for filing the complaint suffer the impact of the implementation of the custody hearing in Brazil? Therefore, this study proposed to analyze the time limit for filing a complaint, when in a custody hearing, after a ministerial manifestation, preventive detention is decreed. The objective was, therefore, to carry out a work, with the aim of analyzing a possible change in the starting day of the period provided for in article 46 of the CPP, which, strictly speaking, has not been observed by doctrine and jurisprudence. As for the means, the research was bibliographic, due to the fact that the theoretical-methodological foundation is necessary for this work

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Juliano de Oliveira Leonel, Centro Universitário Santo Agostinho - UNIFSA - Teresina/PI.

Doutor em Ciências Criminais pela PUCRS. Mestre em Direito pela UCB. Especialista em Direito Penal e Processual Penal – ESA/UFPI. Professor de processo penal da UNIFSA. Defensor Público. Lattes CV: http://lattes.cnpq.br/5963426905730852

Aury Lopes Jr., Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUC - Porto Alegre/RS.

Doutor em Direito Processual Penal (Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 1999). Professor Titular da Faculdade de Direito da PUCRS e professor permanente do PPG em Ciências Criminais da PUCRS. Lattes CV: http://lattes.cnpq.br/4629371641091359

References

BADARÓ, Gustavo. Processo Penal. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2014.

CARNELUTTI, Francesco. Lecciones sobre el Proceso Penal. vol. II. Tradução: Santiago Sentís Melendo. Buenos Aires, Bosch, 1950.

DWORKIN, Ronald. O império do direito. 2. ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2007.

GLOECKNER, Ricardo Jacobsen. Autoritarismo e processo penal: uma genealogia das ideias autoritárias no processo penal brasileiro. vol. 1. Rio de Janeiro: Tirant lo Blanch, 2018.

JARDIM, Afrânio da Silva. Direito Processual Penal. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 1999.

LOPES JR., Aury. Direito processual penal. 15. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2018.

LOPES JR., Aury. Fundamentos do processo penal: introdução crítica. 6. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-11

How to Cite

de Oliveira Leonel, J., & Lopes Jr., A. (2023). A (re)reading of the deadline for offering the complaint from the preventive detention in custody hearing. Boletim IBCCRIM, 31(368). Retrieved from https://publicacoes.ibccrim.org.br/index.php/boletim_1993/article/view/607

Issue

Vol. 31 No. 368 (2023): Boletim IBCCRIM - Julho

Section

Doutrina

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.

Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).