Who is afraid of the Guarantee Judge? An analysis about real obstacles to the acusatory system

Views: 44

Authors

Keywords:

Judge of guarantees, Accusatory system, Constitution, Law 13964/2019

Abstract

This article seeks to deal with the so-called guarantees judge, a measure instituted through Law 13.964/2019 and its importance for the real effectiveness of the accusatory system in the Brazilian legal system. In this sense, considering the decisions of Ministers Dias Toffoli and Luiz Fux in ADI 6299 MC/DF and the current situation of suspension of the application of this and other institutes, the question raised is whether the resistance to implantation to the judge of guarantees is due to the difficulty of overcoming of an inquisitorial system in Brazil. The analysis of the theme goes through a brief discussion about the content of the mentioned decisions, in the light of the guaranteeist perspective of Ferrajoli and of Brazilian proceduralists, who indicate that the arguments against the measure stem from a difficulty in understanding what the accusatory system really consists of and as this is a requirement of the Federal Constitution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Tainá Ferreira e Ferreira, Faculdade de Belém - FABEL - Belém/PA

Mestre e Doutoranda em Direito pela UFPA. Especialista em Ciências Criminais pela PUC/MG. Professora. Lattes CV:  http://lattes.cnpq.br/7864814304817740

References

BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Medida Cautelar na Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade nº 6.298. Relator: Ministro Luiz Fux. Brasília, DF, 15 de janeiro de 2020. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Brasília. Disponível em: <https://portal.stf.jus.br/processos/detalhe.asp ?incidente= 5840274>. Acesso em: 04 mar. 2020.

COORDENADORIA DE IMPRENSA DO TJPA. TJPA já tem sistema similar ao juiz de garantias. TJPA, Belém, 15 jan. 2020. Disponível em: <http://www.tjpa.jus.br/PortalExterno/ imprensa/noticias/Informes/1031111-tjpa-entre-os-primeiros-em-juizado-de-garantias.xhtml>. Acesso em: 15 fev. 2020.

FERRAJOLI, Luigi. Direito e razão: teoria do garantismo penal. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2002.

FERRAJOLI, Luigi. Democracia y Garantismo. 1. ed. Madrid: Trotta Editorial, 2008.

LOPES JR, Aury. Fundamentos do processo penal: introdução crítica. 5 ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2019.

MARQUES, Leonardo Augusto Marinho. A exclusividade da função acusatória e a limitação da atividade do juiz: Inteligência do princípio da separação de poderes e do princípio acusatório. Revista de Informação Legislativa, Brasília, v. 46, n 183, p. 141-154, jul./set. 2009.

MARRAFON, Marco Aurélio. Quadro Mental paranoico não pode imperar na solução de casos jurídicos. CONJUR, 2014. Disponível em: <https://www.conjur.com.br/2014-jul-14/constituicao -poder-quadro-mental-paranoico-nao-imperar>. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2020.

MOSCATELLI, Lívia Yuen Ngan; ARIANO, Raul Abramo. Juiz das garantias: A onda democrática em meio à maré do punitivismo rasteiro. Boletim IBCCRIM, São Paulo, n. 330, mai. 2020.

STRECK, Lenio Luiz; ROCHA, Jorge Bheron. A batalha: o velho inquisitivismo não quer morrer – mas o novo nascerá. CONJUR. 2020. Disponível em: <https://www.conjur.com.br/ 2020-jan-06/opiniao-velho-inquisitivismo-nao-morrer-nascera>. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2020.

THIBAU, Vinicius Lott. Garantismo e processualidade democrática. Belo Horizonte: Editora D’plácido, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-21

How to Cite

Ferreira e Ferreira, T. (2023). Who is afraid of the Guarantee Judge? An analysis about real obstacles to the acusatory system. Boletim IBCCRIM, 28(334), 24–27. Retrieved from https://publicacoes.ibccrim.org.br/index.php/boletim_1993/article/view/894

Issue

Vol. 28 No. 334 (2020): Boletim IBCCRIM - Setembro

Section

Doutrina

License

Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.

Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).

Most read articles by the same author(s)