Criminal liability and artificial intelligence
Responsabilidade penal e inteligência artificial
Views: 59Keywords:
artificial intelligence, criminal liability, personalityAbstract
This article aims to relate legal personality and responsibility related to intelligent artificial entities. Its hypothesis is that not only general AI or superintelligence (still non-existent) can theoretically commit criminal acts: even common AI systems currently available can be trained by criminals to commit acts that violate fundamental rights. And culpable situations (due to negligence, recklessness or malpractice of programmers, designers and directors of AI development companies, for example) must be considered in the event of crimes involving AI. At least currently, therefore, alternatives more consistent with current Criminal Law should be considered for criminal situations involving AI, such as new criminal types in the current law against criminally responsible humans, or further emphasize civil punishment for damages caused by autonomous artificial entities. Specifically, its objectives are: i) to present the possibilities of criminal use of AI, as well as the legal impossibility of attributing criminal liability to artificial entities endowed with this technology at the current moment of technological evolution; ii) to explore new opposing theoretical and legal possibilities — in other words, what should be done for, one day, when there is a general AI, endowed with as much awareness as a human being and, therefore, perhaps guilty. Methodology: hypothetical-deductive procedure method, qualitative approach and bibliographic review technique.
Downloads
References
ABBOTT, Ryan; SARCH, Alex. Punishing Artificial Intelligence: Legal Fiction Or Science Fiction. University of California Davis Law Review, v. 53, n. 1, p. 323-384, 2019. Available at: https://lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu/issues/53/1/articles/53-1_abbott_sarch.html. Access in: 15 apr 2021.
ARNOLD, Bruce Baer; GOUGH, Drew. Turing’s People: Personhood, Artificial Intelligence and Popular Culture. Canberra Law Review, v. 15, n. 1, p. 4-33, 2018. Available at: http://www7.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/journals/CanLawRw//2017/1.html. Access in: 15 apr 2021.
BROADHURST, Roderic et al. Artificial Intelligence and Crime: Report of the ANU Cybercrime Observatory for the Korean Institute of Criminology. Korean Institute of Criminology; Australian National University Cybercrime Observatory; College of Asia and the Pacific: Canberra, 2019. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3407779. Access in: 15 apr 2021.
DREMLIUGA, Roman. How development of Artificial intelligence technology will cause changes in crime and criminal law In: KOKURYO, Jiro; MARACHE, Catharina; WALSH, Toby. AI for Everyone: Benefitting from and building trust in the technology. [S/l] AI Access, 2020, p. 9-26.
CHEN, Jiahong; BURGESS, Paul. The boundaries of legal personhood: how spontaneous intelligence can problematise differences between humans, artificial intelligence, companies and animals. Artificial Intelligence and Law, n. 27, p. 73-92, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-018-9229-x.
KING, Thomas C. Artificial Intelligence Crime: An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Foreseeable Threats and Solutions. Science and Engineering Ethics, v. 26, n. 1, p. 89-120, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-00081-0
KINGSTON, John K. C. Artificial Intelligence and Legal Liability In: BRAMER, Max; PETRIDIS, Miltos (eds.). Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXXIII: SGAI 2016. Cham: Springer, 2016, p. 269-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47175-4_20.
KIRPICHNIKOV, Danila et al. Criminal Liability of Artificial Intelligence. E3S Web of Conferences, v. 159, p. 1-10, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015904025.
LAGIOIA, Francesca; SARTOR, Giovanni. AI Systems Under Criminal Law: a Legal Analysis and a Regulatory Perspective. Philosophy & Technology, v. 33, n. 3, p. 433-465, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00362-x
LEI Wei. Legal risk and criminal imputation of weak artificial intelligence. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, v. 490, n. 6, p. 1-6, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/490/6/062085
LEMLEY, Mark A.; CASEY, Bryan. Remedies for Robots. The University of Chicago Law Review, v. 86, n. 15, p. 1311-1396, 2019. Available at: https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/publication/remedies-robots. Access in: 15 apr 2021.
LIMA, Gabriel et al. Explaining the Punishment Gap of AI and Robots. Arxiv, p. 1-10, 2020a. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.06507. Access in: 15 apr 2021.
LIMA, Gabriel et al. Will Punishing Robots Become Imperative in the Future? In: BERNHAUPT Regina et al. (eds.). Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 1-8, 2020b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383006.
MAJUMDAR, Priyanka; RONALD, Bindu; RAUTDESAI, Rupal. Artificial Intelligence, Legal Personhood and Determination of Criminal Liability. Journal of Critical Reviews, v. 6, n. 6, p. 323-325, 2019. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22159/jcr.06.06.48.
OSMANI, Nora. The Complexity of Criminal Liability of AI Systems. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, v. 14, n. 1, p. 53-82, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2020-1-3.
PAGALLO, Ugo. AI and bad robots: the criminology of automation In: MCGUIRE, M. R.; HOLT, Thomas J. (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Technology, Crime and Justice. London: Routledge, 2016, p. 643-653.
PARVIAINEN, Jana; COECKELBERGH, Mark. The political choreography of the Sophia robot: beyond robot rights and citizenship to political performances for the social robotics market. AI & Society, p. 1-10, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01104-w.
RAHMAN, Rofi Aulia; HABIBULAH, Rizki. The Criminal Liability of Artificial Intelligence: Is It Plausible to Hitherto Indonesian Criminal System? Legality, v. 27, n. 2, p. 147-160, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jihl.v27i2.10153
SIMMLER, Monika; MARKWALDER, Nora. Guilty Robots? Rethinking the Nature of Culpability and Legal Personhood in an Age of Artificial Intelligence. Criminal Law Forum, v. 30, p. 1-31, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-018-9360-0.
SUMANTRI, Viony Kresna. Legal Responsibility on Errors of the Artificial Intelligence-based Robots. Lentera Hukum, v. 6, n. 2, p. 333-348, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v6.i2.10154.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Os direitos autorais dos artigos publicados são do autor, com direitos do periódico sobre a primeira publicação.
Os autores somente poderão utilizar os mesmos resultados em outras publicações indicando claramente este periódico como o meio da publicação original. Se não houver tal indicação, considerar-se-á situação de autoplágio.
Portanto, a reprodução, total ou parcial, dos artigos aqui publicados fica sujeita à expressa menção da procedência de sua publicação neste periódico, citando-se o volume e o número dessa publicação. Para efeitos legais, deve ser consignada a fonte de publicação original.